IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] Summary of discussion of Ticket 5 (Cookie ordering)

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Sun, 11 April 2010 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5893A687E for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.132
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.372, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HOEnkuWe0zi2 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [83.168.254.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B5F3A684B for <http-state@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [83.168.254.42]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9) with ESMTP id o3BIAtDe028063; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:10:55 +0200
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:10:55 +0200
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
In-Reply-To: <u2o5c4444771004110954tfbb069ddj6f80356bc4bd47d3@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1004111950270.9336@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <5c4444771002151547k75bbd0e7rfd2ccf735bdb2e37@mail.gmail.com> <u2o5c4444771004110954tfbb069ddj6f80356bc4bd47d3@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: http-state <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] Summary of discussion of Ticket 5 (Cookie ordering)
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:11:13 -0000

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Adam Barth wrote:

> In the two months since I sent this email, there hasn't been a whole lot 
> more discussion on this topic.  We discussed the issue at the working group 
> meeting at IETF77.  Unfortunately, Daniel Stenberg wasn't in attendance, so 
> we missed out on his perspective.

Well, I've stated it on this list many times so I don't think my repeating it 
in person would've made a significant difference. I'm sad the outcome went 
this way, but I'm well aware of how these things work and I'll continue to 
argue my standpoint in other areas.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email