IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] 'HTTP State Management Mechanism' to Proposed Standard

Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Thu, 03 March 2011 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9970A3A69FD for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:54:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.86
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.86 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b+2TAfY5WmHX for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D91C3A6800 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws6 with SMTP id 6so1563470vws.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:55:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.167.72 with SMTP id zm8mr2491975vdb.58.1299185573773; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:52:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v26sm669312vcr.37.2011.03.03.12.52.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:52:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws6 with SMTP id 6so1560886vws.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.123.213 with SMTP id q21mr435969vcr.151.1299185571111; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:52:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.74.68 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:45:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D6FDDC5.5080200@stpeter.im>
References: <4D6FDBD7.5020907@KingsMountain.com> <4D6FDDC5.5080200@stpeter.im>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:45:21 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinn4g_zhStiyfeOYZWvkRjOQzPKXXjxNm3o7vRC@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, httpstate chair <httpstate-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, IETF HTTP State WG <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] 'HTTP State Management Mechanism' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:54:11 -0000

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> On 3/3/11 11:20 AM, =JeffH wrote:
>> But the person who did the vast majority of the work, and who's idea it
>> was to tackle this in the first place, is _Adam Barth_, who deserves an
>> outsized chunk of the credit. Thanks for hanging in there and making
>> this happen Adam.
>
> Hear, hear! Many thanks to Adam.

Thanks everyone.  I think Bil Corry also deserves a lot of credit for
kick starting this process with this email:

http://groups.google.com/group/ietf-httponly-wg/browse_thread/thread/7d076cd0dee6554c

Adam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email