Re: [http-state] IETF-wide Last Call for -httpstate-cookie-10 ?

[Adam Barth <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <[e-mail]> wrote:
> * =JeffH wrote:
>>Are there any objections to progressing -httpstate-cookie-10 to IETF-wide last
>>call?
>
> It was my understanding that some of the comments on the -08 draft have
> not yet been resolved; I recall Adam saying he wanted to conduct some
> tests on some issues first; the -10 draft for instance still has a re-
> quirement to treat the year "69" as 1969 even though the major implemen-
> tations I've tested do not appear to do that (my test results are in
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state/current/msg00833.html).

According to <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state/current/msg00834.html>,
I seem to have asked you for a test case, which I don't have a record
of you ever providing:

[[
Do you have test cases that demonstrate these claims?  If so, I'd be
happy to add them to the test suite.
]]

In any case, the test suite isn't done yet and it's not a prerequisite
for finishing this document.

Adam