IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3765)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 26 October 2013 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: http-state@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C7D11E8177 for <http-state@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2e55nbFoCwwm for <http-state@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEC011E8131 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.235.154] ([79.109.233.10]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFPyK-1VWiQ21gN2-00EJc0 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:14:02 +0200
Message-ID: <526BA3F5.6000602@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:13:57 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, abarth@eecs.berkeley.edu, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com
References: <20131026072908.37CBE726001@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131026072908.37CBE726001@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PBvU9HyfuAPvUt+83SFbRvnJVU8G84wH7BEta6kJV7rDBcrqUfl pPNA2xNfgywpEY9bNe+mptR1kk5zqEaX7DyaVBTV3GRU679cKweTSJEoX0atLPXJoWTdlDQ jz+GCJoCbvYiJStAmibFlutVwCt6T0pYcA+bloXGmh3Jb2nBaqFByDHEgiC5xZ8+Pfpi09t CNhNUQJPvNCUE/dG6N68A==
Cc: info@firmen.jknaupp.de, http-state@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [http-state] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6265 (3765)
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:14:11 -0000

On 2013-10-26 09:29, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6265,
> "HTTP State Management Mechanism".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6265&eid=3765
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Johannes Knaupp <info@firmen.jknaupp.de>
>
> Section: 4.1.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Servers SHOULD NOT include more than one Set-Cookie header field in
> the same response with the same cookie-name.  (See Section 5.2 for
> how user agents handle this case.)
>
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Servers MUST NOT include more than one Set-Cookie header field in
> the same response.
> ...

The spec says what it says on purpose. Changing the text as suggested 
would break the cookie system.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email