Re: [http-state] New Issue: The domain attribute and I18N domain names

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 03 February 2010 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5BC3A6CCC for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:17:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.742
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mf7qoFAQ3Y5m for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9153A6CC9 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-234.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-234.cisco.com [64.101.72.234]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6C7740332 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:18:29 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4B69CC04.6030901@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:18:28 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: http-state@ietf.org
References: <op.u7jnvc0pqrq7tp@acorna.invalid.invalid>
In-Reply-To: <op.u7jnvc0pqrq7tp@acorna.invalid.invalid>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms040602020206010709090603"
Subject: Re: [http-state] New Issue: The domain attribute and I18N domain names
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:17:48 -0000

On 2/3/10 2:12 AM, Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> AFAICT the current draft does not address how servers should specify
> domain names in the domain attribute of a Set-Cookie header when the
> Unicode form of the domain name contain non-ASCII characters, e.g.
> blåbær.no (xn--blbr-roah.no).
> 
> My suggestion is that the A-label (punycode) form should be used in all
> cases, but if that is too strict the only other alternative is to allow
> UTF-8 encoding of the name in addition to the recommended use of the
> A-label.

That seems reasonable because it is consistent with the IDNA2008 work,
but be aware that once you go down that path you might never be able to
switch to UTF8-encoded domain names because you'll need to interoperate
with software that only does A-labels and not U-labels. Forever. But
picking one format is better than allowing both A-labels and U-labels, I
think. Your Applications Area Advisor was heavily involved in the
IDNA2008 effort, so she might have some valuable insights here. :)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/