Re: [http-state] [httpstate] #7: Better testing for date parsing
"httpstate issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Wed, 07 April 2010 23:32 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADBF3A681C for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_84=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9v-NJdALpqK for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9FE3A67D3 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1NzejH-0006sY-JR; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:32:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: httpstate issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.6
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.6, by Edgewall Software
To: ietf@adambarth.com
X-Trac-Project: httpstate
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:32:15 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/httpstate/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpstate/trac/ticket/7#comment:1
Message-ID: <071.c87f36cb679edcefb75a6c9959d9f046@tools.ietf.org>
References: <062.d0ebb5c66348fb494b9de88ff025a022@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 7
In-Reply-To: <062.d0ebb5c66348fb494b9de88ff025a022@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ietf@adambarth.com, http-state@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: http-state@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [http-state] [httpstate] #7: Better testing for date parsing
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: trac@localhost.amsl.com
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:32:19 -0000
#7: Better testing for date parsing
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: ietf@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: cookie | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Changes (by ietf@…):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
We have lot of date tests now:
http://github.com/abarth/http-
state/blob/master/tests/data/dates/examples.json
http://github.com/abarth/http-state/blob/master/tests/data/dates/bsd-
examples.json
examples.json are under the usual IETF IPR regime. The ones in bsd-
examples.json are BSD licensed. As suggested at IETF77, these test are
formated as two strings that should parse to the same date (with one being
in a normal date format).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpstate/trac/ticket/7#comment:1>
httpstate <http://tools.ietf.org/httpstate/>
- Re: [http-state] [httpstate] #7: Better testing f… httpstate issue tracker