IETF Logo Mail Archive

[http-state] IETF-wide Last Call for -httpstate-cookie-10 ?

=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Wed, 25 August 2010 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254A63A686E for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.836
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.836 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.060, BAYES_05=-1.11, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UnXyZToDTw2j for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1551F3A63C9 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 13196 invoked by uid 0); 25 Aug 2010 21:59:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 21:59:19 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kingsmountain.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=Ppexp4jQfDHs6GFVvfM+Du2a8tLhmJgxL4NcoanpP52aYguC/Ue8GA27YOdjLad0ihW83lZ+CiujZrX02WlM2DQMd9moZ/d2UAKLbu19i5BG2o1ELex6tsP9r+3N9CVT;
Received: from c-24-4-122-173.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.122.173] helo=[192.168.11.10]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1OoO07-0004Nq-H7 for http-state@ietf.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:59:19 -0600
Message-ID: <4C759235.6010000@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:59:17 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF HTTP State WG <http-state@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.4.122.173 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Subject: [http-state] IETF-wide Last Call for -httpstate-cookie-10 ?
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:58:48 -0000

Hi,

<chair>

Adam, during our meeting at IETF-78 Maastricht, committed to making some minor 
fixups to -httpstate-cookie-09, which he did that day, yielding 
-httpstate-cookie-10  (thanks!).

There've been no comments wrt -10 on the list since then. I've read it, and 
essentially don't have any comments.

In our Maastricht session, we agreed that the changes from -08 (WG last call 
draft) to -09 do not necessitate another WG Last Call. The changes from -09 to 
-10 are minimal.  The diff is available here..

http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-10.txt


Are there any objections to progressing -httpstate-cookie-10 to IETF-wide last 
call?

Please speak up by this Friday 27-Aug if you have objections.

Of course there is still time to review the draft and get comments in, that is 
what Last Calls are for.

thanks,

=JeffH

</chair>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email