IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] httpstate session @IETF-78 Maastricht

Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Wed, 07 July 2010 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBDC3A684D for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ScvaFUvTrgl for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A063A684A for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so2419766iwn.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.148.20 with SMTP id n20mr5224638ibv.196.1278519909725; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e8sm27092621ibb.2.2010.07.07.09.25.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so2419726iwn.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.31.197 with SMTP id z5mr6422472ibc.80.1278519907236; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.143.145 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C348DAC.2070205@gmx.de>
References: <4C244A84.4080305@KingsMountain.com> <4C348DAC.2070205@gmx.de>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:24:47 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimkWeXAEBCSqymDkDrGbcJVN-Ii5DnQaZB_vlbZ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IETF HTTP State WG <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] httpstate session @IETF-78 Maastricht
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:25:07 -0000

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 25.06.2010 08:19, =JeffH wrote:
>>
>> Ok, the draft IETF-78 Maastricht agenda is here..
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/78/agenda.html
>>
>> ..and announcement msg attached below.
>>
>>
>> In talking with Adam and Yngve some, the thought is that
>> draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-09 is largely done (if you have comments,
>> please get them sent to the list) and so agenda bashing and assessing
>> that I-D and next steps for it will likely consume only 30min on the
>> outside.
>> ...
>
> Is there a plan to publish a new ID based on the LC comments in time before
> the meeting?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-09 incorporates
almost all of the LC comments.  I think I have one or two emails that
didn't make it into that draft (including one from you).  I'm holding
out on uploading a new version in case I get more comments before the
deadline.

Adam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email