Re: [http-state] HTTP WG meeting @IETF-80 Prague CZ ?

tho <tho@koanlogic.com> Sun, 13 March 2011 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <tho@koanlogic.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6613F3A6B91 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.505
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_RECV_IP_069060096=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q+bYSpuvKOOa for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gonzo.koanlogic.com (unknown [69.60.118.166]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931043A6A02 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host245-57-dynamic.42-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it ([79.42.57.245]:56376 helo=[192.168.1.4]) by sp2844.serverpronto.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.50) id 1PysJd-0003wB-MN; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:55:12 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: tho <tho@koanlogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D432F58.3080406@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:54:32 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0256B9B7-D58D-4A28-9B64-E1B8B8FBF646@koanlogic.com>
References: <4D432F58.3080406@KingsMountain.com>
To: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 79.42.57.245
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tho@koanlogic.com
X-Spam-DCC: :
X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on sp2844.serverpronto.com)
Cc: IETF HTTP State WG <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] HTTP WG meeting @IETF-80 Prague CZ ?
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:53:51 -0000

On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:04 PM, =JeffH wrote:
> Do folks feel there is a need to hold a f2f HTTP WG meeting @IETF-80 Prague CZ (March 27-April 1) ?
> 
> We have a couple weeks to decide.
> 
> draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie is almost complete. If folks have burning ideas for new/enhanced HTTP State Management approaches to present/discuss face-to-face, and are prepared to do so, that'd be a reason to have a session. Otherwise, we can skip IETF-80, and figure out whether we actually have follow-on work, what it might be, discuss rechartering, and see about meeting @IETF-81 Quebec (say).
> 
> thanks,

Has something been decided in this regard ?

t.