IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] IETF-wide Last Call for -httpstate-cookie-10 ?

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Fri, 27 August 2010 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826733A687E for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.856
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.856 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.743, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-5d9Zj3XqSI for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 995683A68AF for <http-state@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2010 20:34:37 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-223-208-027.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO hive) [94.223.208.27] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 27 Aug 2010 22:34:37 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/dNuBDoArdujV/Gp8dCO4CxHz/LaTwVqkNFcaoKv arpa/HMbfEKBxo
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:34:37 +0200
Message-ID: <5l7g76hcdhobfsd4nrilfhuvth42br7sjf@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <4C759235.6010000@KingsMountain.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C759235.6010000@KingsMountain.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: IETF HTTP State WG <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] IETF-wide Last Call for -httpstate-cookie-10 ?
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:34:20 -0000

* =JeffH wrote:
>Are there any objections to progressing -httpstate-cookie-10 to IETF-wide last 
>call?

It was my understanding that some of the comments on the -08 draft have
not yet been resolved; I recall Adam saying he wanted to conduct some
tests on some issues first; the -10 draft for instance still has a re-
quirement to treat the year "69" as 1969 even though the major implemen-
tations I've tested do not appear to do that (my test results are in
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state/current/msg00833.html).
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email