Re: [http-state] http-state charter

Prasad Shenoy <prasad.shenoy@gmail.com> Thu, 30 July 2009 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <prasad.shenoy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4903A6B8B for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qk+mV97iDHmM for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f204.google.com (mail-px0-f204.google.com [209.85.216.204]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2643A6818 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so113463pxi.29 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kYPZYzcodsRS/h9LEhl1jKZrmdN5fS3Y5iblLAX5ipo=; b=gNTluHnrp5e1e3Fre5D9IMzbgKmRWp5TKQEpb1DZFPXh5tHDhTaG8AsEOXNAKxoEE3 0zml136zhyBe8hJOxfhaUOPSlbSPfsY4/f57W4BJMFzj5yqPvfYFAgYiuT04gBDDCyrj FcZXQlcAhgvk9Qq1ZaA1JYix9htCSCV0eGxxM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mLz8mgoRlIdPQEMzMhSW+NiN2/YnXbCxAfXcjPo+r9ybR/T8Y8/NsIUMMvBCuN7QZu z38Lo9udCtetT+cjGeECIjDsvwBhPeqvpQgXZ9ka3pBrGsuT8AKZ2fSoPctJmNWj5jhR LwTr/iH2+oJJWjoaGNhVRfILiQrZR0U9DnGmM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.97.77 with SMTP id k13mr1324320vcn.30.1248959857277; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0907292332310.3168@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
References: <4A70D2D2.9050900@corry.biz> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0907292332310.3168@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:17:37 -0400
Message-ID: <43c6c8500907300617ta3d73adl79629027b2848fa8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Prasad Shenoy <prasad.shenoy@gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "http-state@ietf.org" <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] http-state charter
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:17:40 -0000

That's a very good point. Also, would things like CORS have any affect
on how we look (or ignore) HTTP State Management in it's current form.
Is someone out there already thinking about having a CORS cookie?

Thanks & Regards,
Prasad N. Shenoy



On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Ian Hickson<ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Bil Corry wrote:
>>
>> Much delayed, but I'm now working on creating our charter.  I've
>> included a first draft below; it borrows heavily from the httpbis
>> charter.  Feedback welcomed.
>
> Looks good.
>
> I would encourage us to also include adding new features that have a
> critical mass of support to the scope of the group's work. It should of
> course be very difficult, process-wise, to add something, but we shouldn't
> require new features to wait for an entire cycle of the cookie spec, if
> something does come up that is widely accepted as being useful.
>
> (We wouldn't want to finish writing this spec only to find that while we
> were at it, the browser vendors got together and added a new feature like
> httpOnly without it getting into the spec.)
>
> --
> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
> _______________________________________________
> http-state mailing list
> http-state@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state
>