IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] Updated draft

Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Mon, 17 August 2009 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000773A6AE9 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.170, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SCimBNav37vD for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f196.google.com (mail-vw0-f196.google.com [209.85.212.196]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397F63A6DAE for <http-state@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws34 with SMTP id 34so2836705vws.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.12.130 with SMTP id x2mr5384950vcx.75.1250540721194; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A89B4CD.9010708@gmx.de>
References: <7789133a0908151008p35ff30e6w2761368fe70d41a6@mail.gmail.com> <4A889417.9020709@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908170929100.22132@yvahk2.pbagnpgbe.fr> <7789133a0908170853r5a81b84cu1308049256f51d2c@mail.gmail.com> <7789133a0908170908r4e3e8d30v7187bbf67f76b95c@mail.gmail.com> <4A8996DE.4030905@gmx.de> <7789133a0908171152q5cdd97beia9e4034148e63e0e@mail.gmail.com> <4A89B35C.6010601@gmx.de> <op.uytnzlkm64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local> <4A89B4CD.9010708@gmx.de>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:25:00 -0700
Message-ID: <7789133a0908171325i4c908530k43d317a4c777b10@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, http-state <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] Updated draft
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:25:19 -0000

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Julian Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Anne, I do understand that. I was merely replying to the claim that at some
> point every implementation needs to "decide how to sort". That's simply not
> true; an implementation could decide not to care, and let some default
> apply.

Which, itself, would be a decision (and likely a poor decision).

Adam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email