From nobody Sun Oct 30 01:05:08 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9E2C14F73F; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 01:05:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.808 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=Hvg6V5kx; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=NBmTTSzL Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aseCM2LriYSQ; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 01:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EE70C14F607; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 01:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E67D320030E; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 04:04:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 30 Oct 2022 04:04:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1667117095; x= 1667203495; bh=cNDIBJD6f9I+uDzNB6+X8h9/RywYZTNRAQXH+/DSzS0=; b=H vg6V5kx1gI/9wnlC4BdEv/rzwcA+OroHZ7s5MF6lV+yAjGX51FP1RFqjUUYLsz7f rsYwkNXyARGwBcsaKdpz71e4O2SvQyIXLWCPBS406tzRFTp7nXVeZd5drmp/CBVx 2DjKQCcEaQbTiUgJLfcKTUOc5IdFpazP74MYpzwWsInkvlTDEZTNjReA4fgR90t9 cM9BK82WFbjh0fGSIrCa/CLQreixCZhqHskszCCfxxGWp/LX/TXLjcCWJWuVyCTk 3nAPN0LsEcz6VKN9IRy1ziYQ+P4FT1PG+flZ9IAqH5vBZhLr871jSFuAx51N/iEY AXoXdvKkK63GaOrOHqM0Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1667117095; x= 1667203495; bh=cNDIBJD6f9I+uDzNB6+X8h9/RywYZTNRAQXH+/DSzS0=; b=N BmTTSzLYnETfJSX531zWZgfA2IntxqZvg40t7RfP70n96AGrJzF9UustJV1xoHMx gYVPRfWSjtRADBURoc82ksZ+nsP/4HpDs3ISBYOgz/y8fogSs18aYkrOOQv8lFVs zzigUPC/wGS9qDXNrSDjY5luDVlVsB3tPdjk2VTVP3sxG46TohKwmEzND5w1xxdB /Eaz0dXb0pX6lr+Mvv4aRtGlc6W8usLOn3E+qFIUNFbCxMEfJuEhHFPjLnobZwr0 wSHpSRkEkuUs0aJhBIHpvekwMJQxOEUKD5NF1jQjfsfCkESzKROffxIchd6BpId1 LiiNSIC/UCfEJU4+XCpFA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvgedrtdelgdduvdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghr khcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepjeefudefjedvhfekvdeghffggfdvhfelffejgfdtkefhtedvgffgieefvdfg gefhnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhmnhhoth drnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 04:04:54 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\)) From: Mark Nottingham In-Reply-To: <166690880800.46780.14432111778502052910@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 08:04:53 +0000 Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis.all@ietf.org, httpapi@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <196F301E-3E38-443A-AB38-7B2D869AC9F3@mnot.net> References: <166690880800.46780.14432111778502052910@ietfa.amsl.com> To: Pete Resnick X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [httpapi] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04 X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 08:05:08 -0000 Hi Pete, Thanks for the review. Seems reasonable; we'll revisit this wording. = I've recorded this at: https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/57 Cheers, > On 27 Oct 2022, at 11:13 pm, Pete Resnick via Datatracker = wrote: >=20 > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review result: Ready >=20 > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. >=20 > For more information, please see the FAQ at >=20 > . >=20 > Document: draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04 > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review Date: 2022-10-27 > IETF LC End Date: 2022-11-03 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat >=20 > Summary: Ready to go; one comment below. >=20 > Major issues: None >=20 > Minor issues: None >=20 > Nits/editorial comments: >=20 > This paragraph in section 4 struck me oddly: >=20 > An extension member (see Section 3.2) MAY occur in the Problem field > if its name is compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see > Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and if the defining problem type > specifies a Structured Type to serialize the value into. >=20 > That almost sounds like what you want to say is: >=20 > If an extension member (see Section 3.2) occurs in the Problem = field, > its name MUST be compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see > Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and the defining problem type > MUST specify a Structured Type to serialize the value into. >=20 > I'm curious if you are making a normative statement that would get = lost in the > current form. But I'm not sure what the high-order bit here is, so I = leave it > to you. >=20 >=20 -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/