From nobody Tue Feb 14 21:08:33 2023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D56C187983; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:08:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b="S2s510GI"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="imPX7BmQ" Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XAM7G64t8wKU; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:08:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A50FC169505; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:08:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE835C0107; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:08:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:08:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1676437707; x= 1676524107; bh=480jvcsgddd1oANb3i1zK8b6TJaqVuigs3m2DnL3kgI=; b=S 2s510GIi2s0SedXqqMvFECkoHsM5KM0Zua4XFXKxBDwFHnFOHDis7M1OngaAyk3P 9ZnueFzSlWYNgXNUIP3Uelm2jLU5qUKA8j/NmkcCHD7EDWUf/7lqZwbVVcewGMQe 8Jxbf3hDTu1N6zxiH+38X9Co48WempWHLEfy6892zUA6W2HDX6CZWGpimck1/vHB ePnZd/IXTuVdIUmL2aXPc1h2ljYSq+2n55lVAQzCGtwkzn4IgbuLsNhKgmMBs3M8 ENJ69BHFrcbXPxfI3kvWfyBNyKMLDDsR6XaexEvOuTThHrpV43LdXuZ+M5U5NvqA ReJITak26MZJvn5/efTtg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1676437707; x= 1676524107; bh=480jvcsgddd1oANb3i1zK8b6TJaqVuigs3m2DnL3kgI=; b=i mPX7BmQYgcVYq5RG7Prq8OM2GfZz4w6lxTfcU8HUrciFnalGAu+ALAjldQzeJCJ8 ZEcsq+SB89rf7aEN9iOrMd0QnqDBdlzdgXsyxsiU6JRTZCftEORD14ZCpexXd7Q+ ODpHLNIYdIvl1J5rRv3bvAadjAIhk8xDeoLSrLJX5iA6I4lXOptGCqVSa+pH9ZHx rNWyNXs9SvOLa9C+3SGbopzYONMQ46PK6N6MFl+9ZaC3mYYIlHt1r5DlobM7+D34 /nf5EtFS0ywVxiYzOMVjYzGv9D06e0IZqkWASa5pYad2tCJVe8LbyKmWMzD6S+2t SOk/xsUVH0FnHvnlt76NA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudeigedgjeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghr khcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptddtgefgueevtddugfdtkeffudegveetffegjeelhfdvtedvueejteegueeg teetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:08:26 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\)) From: Mark Nottingham In-Reply-To: <0119F2EA-3353-46D9-9496-B115B9655A92@eggert.org> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:08:05 -0800 Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, HTTP APIs Working Group , Last Call , Erik Wilde , Sanjay Dalal Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5F1069BD-3BF8-4D5D-82CB-0AA40EC646F5@mnot.net> References: <166690880800.46780.14432111778502052910@ietfa.amsl.com> <0119F2EA-3353-46D9-9496-B115B9655A92@eggert.org> To: Lars Eggert , Pete Resnick X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [httpapi] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04 X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:08:33 -0000 Hi Pete, I like the suggestion below; anyone else have an issue with = incorporating it? Cheers, >=20 >> On Oct 28, 2022, at 01:13, Pete Resnick via Datatracker = wrote: >>=20 >> This paragraph in section 4 struck me oddly: >>=20 >> An extension member (see Section 3.2) MAY occur in the Problem field >> if its name is compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see >> Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and if the defining problem type >> specifies a Structured Type to serialize the value into. >>=20 >> That almost sounds like what you want to say is: >>=20 >> If an extension member (see Section 3.2) occurs in the Problem = field, >> its name MUST be compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see >> Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and the defining problem type >> MUST specify a Structured Type to serialize the value into. >>=20 >> I'm curious if you are making a normative statement that would get = lost in the >> current form. But I'm not sure what the high-order bit here is, so I = leave it >> to you. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/