Re: [httpapi] Should we adopt linkset media types and link relation?

[Erik Wilde <[e-mail]>]

hello rich.

On 2020-12-10 08:05, Salz, Rich wrote:
> At our meeting in IETF 109, we discussed
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wilde-linkset-07.txt
> 
> There was some discussion about overlap with other specifications, but 
> also interest in adoption.  We said we’d have more discussion for 
> issuing the call, so please use this thread (or start others) to have 
> that discussion. In particular, if there are concerns about adopting the 
> document, please speak up. This is an ongoing discussion, probably not 
> going to be resolved in what remains of this month/year. :)

again, i am (of course) in favor of adopting this draft. the one issue 
that was raised in the meeting at IETF 109 was the existence of the CoRE 
linking model and how it relates to the linkset model proposed in our draft.

herbert van de sompel and myself have discussed this issue, and we'll 
get back to this list with a brief explanation of how these two models 
compare, and why we felt that CoRE did not meet our needs. we hope that 
this explanation will resolve the open issue about the linkset draft.

thanks and cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:[e-mail] |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |