IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [httpapi] linkset draft ready for next steps

Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net> Thu, 29 July 2021 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <erik.wilde@dret.net>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F433A1DB8 for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 03:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wxf1lUJsF17C for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 03:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postoffice.gristmillmedia.com (dret.net [209.188.86.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261433A1D95 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 03:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 222.167.198.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch ([178.198.167.222]:60742 helo=dretpro.home) by postoffice.gristmillmedia.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <erik.wilde@dret.net>) id 1m93Zr-0007Xh-8O; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 06:47:47 -0400
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Phil Archer <phil.archer@gs1.org>, "httpapi@ietf.org" <httpapi@ietf.org>
Cc: Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
References: <625dc350-44bd-2a72-5258-612ddbea8f37@dret.net> <6b4033a1-a68a-d540-e9be-b03270c8e946@gmx.de> <52BC49CD-015D-402D-B4D3-34FE87C7A03C@akamai.com> <8aadeeae-6593-d7f1-4174-8aac1d97634b@dret.net> <9ee6d3d5-7e3b-ed91-7f79-c62bb4d47889@gmx.de> <PH0PR08MB72251025E347B2CB52E51963B7199@PH0PR08MB7225.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <2cded692-1398-3e08-5b05-c1d5e7645697@gmx.de> <PH0PR08MB7225958F3F9EF523CC213337B7EB9@PH0PR08MB7225.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <f0c9bd7f-8ae8-7467-feaa-6cd2ac7761bc@gmx.de>
From: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>
Message-ID: <7fd427b6-e28f-1d14-1c95-c704a840d7aa@dret.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:47:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f0c9bd7f-8ae8-7467-feaa-6cd2ac7761bc@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - postoffice.gristmillmedia.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dret.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: authenticated_id: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/Iq3p8JF4PqQt8MvWBZ0aqrH8QPo>
Subject: Re: [httpapi] linkset draft ready for next steps
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:47:56 -0000

hello julian.

On 2021-07-29 12:33, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Am 29.07.2021 um 10:21 schrieb Phil Archer:
>> We need to come back to this discussion and come to a resolution 
>> before we can progress to last call (and thanks MNot for your comments 
>> today as well).
>> When I created a JSON Linkset visualization tool [1] I included 
>> support for multilingual labels (and there's one in the sample used in 
>> the demo) without any difficulty.
>> So Julian and others, would you be OK with keeping this?
> 
> I have no problem keeping it. I just wanted to clarify, that I, in my
> role as author of the spec that made things that complicated, wouldn't
> object to dropping the complexity...

;-) that's good to hear! one of the goals of the spec was to align with 
the model of RFC 8288 without trying to change/improve it. i do agree 
than in hindsight, maybe the web linking model would look slightly 
different today and so would linksets as a result, but given that we 
have implementations already, i am glad to hear that we can keep the 
model as it is.

thanks and cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@dret.net |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email