IETF Logo Mail Archive

[httpapi] Should we adopt linkset media types and link relation?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 10 December 2020 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF723A106E for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:05:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tkf8awCs0ekS for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4270C3A106D for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 0BAFxTBC030647 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:05:21 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=1zPn0SgWRflEzsECdBrUXShbooedzy77lWXqI84P/Gg=; b=C2/5S/HWkk47rRU6WHNU0kEX5A/iMHrtEH8SQpwXTyUfPtiqgqoOXhaVaOniSBA7Ueax Af5/KB6zCRNHWbB0AUUlTe3Ol1oGMmJl3iJbneZl9FqBSh8RuQfyL43FmanwTMYQJ2VG u+2Eo5gj+CFmTzBdY/Pr1yEBHHl8AfiHulqE/KSKQP9sqL/SpzcteAe9n4he+W8GlnZ2 zU+V5V5TUMtNwRz9r5TNuaV8OFaHYk0dBkXNuYU52qgU2JZ/Xj7xYzDL9fPOUlcQPS4O +G1bz1woKfQp5dc+0AeZLeCtTn17O4+fQ6gMabX3d6yVxmGf+Wyk/WEFShZJAO2JiUxM cw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 3583jmr5y7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:05:20 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0BAG42v8004022 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:05:19 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3586e332kc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:05:19 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:05:18 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.008; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:05:18 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "httpapi@ietf.org" <httpapi@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Should we adopt linkset media types and link relation?
Thread-Index: AQHWzw5ANCi0d6N62k+2t9Jo7Hp+/w==
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:05:17 +0000
Message-ID: <48058830-D096-4DBE-8476-0487544D880E@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.44.20120703
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_48058830D0964DBE84760487544D880Eakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-10_06:2020-12-09, 2020-12-10 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=970 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012100102
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-10_06:2020-12-09, 2020-12-10 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=885 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012100102
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.18) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/NJpw0mdwaXzLrttYjbjxoNw-buY>
Subject: [httpapi] Should we adopt linkset media types and link relation?
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:05:24 -0000

At our meeting in IETF 109, we discussed
                https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wilde-linkset-07.txt

There was some discussion about overlap with other specifications, but also interest in adoption.  We said we’d have more discussion for issuing the call, so please use this thread (or start others) to have that discussion. In particular, if there are concerns about adopting the document, please speak up. This is an ongoing discussion, probably not going to be resolved in what remains of this month/year. :)

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status