Re: [httpapi] rfc7807 errata or just "more"

[Roberto Polli <[e-mail]>]

Hi Sanjay,


Il giorno gio 21 gen 2021 alle ore 02:11 Sanjay Dalal
<[e-mail]> ha scritto:
> >RFC7807 could add "containedProblems" property (or some similar name) that is an array of problem objects.
> Agree. What would be the next step? Should a repo be created so we can start working on a revision?

Before creating a repo, I'd start with a shared gdoc with a basic
proposal. The content can be in markdown, if you like.

> >I would like to find a convergent solution for both Problem and Content-Warning
> This could broaden the scope of Problem Details and Content-Warning both which may not be desirable, imo. Would love to hear from other members of the group.
>
> https://github.com/dret/I-D/blob/master/http-warning/draft-cedik-http-warning-02.
> "Note that this specification specifically targets warnings and not errors, meaning that while it may be useful for clients to understand the warning condition and act on it, they also may choose to ignore it and treat the response as a successful one."

http-warning has a proposal for both warning notification (the
headers) and warning serialization (how to convey the actual
warnings). iiuc the sentence above refers to the headers part, not the
warning serialization.

My opinion is that we should investigate eventual convergence between
the warning serialization and the "containedProblems".

Looking forward to further comments,
R.