Subject: Re: [httpapi] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04

From: Erik Wilde <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:27:27 +0000

hello mark.

On 2023-02-15 05:08, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I like the suggestion below; anyone else have an issue with incorporating it?
> 
>>>   If an extension member (see Section 3.2) occurs in the Problem field,
>>>   its name MUST be compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see
>>>   Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and the defining problem type
>>>   MUST specify a Structured Type to serialize the value into.

looks good to me. but what about replacing "Structured Type" (which is a 
term that's never used in that spec) with "Structured Data Type (see 
Section 3 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS])"?

thanks and cheers,

dret.

-- 
Erik Wilde | mailto:[email-masked]    |
            | https://youtube.com/ErikWilde |