IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [httpapi] Link relationship types for authentication

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 28 January 2021 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B063A12C2 for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:23:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=L3vMLUu8; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=KPk2wHS4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ThHb9Z4qTWEq for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B5A3A12C3 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:23:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113E2A1E; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 01:23:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 01:23:32 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=4 5H16ckAcIqzVC2GiGe3hS8scRl4dLu8y6UAyh0FF/c=; b=L3vMLUu8FpbWs4Vef mjpuB2hwHRkdj4SLdah1rTzAn5UtjqgRYSVODFtcSU3XtfH4AwSYxra12OtFNNy0 EZ5r9AMHNoynfUGRsG2mctxH4Cqs3zNdm/guPoiuGSkSLAM69OivOHJWkuDs8Lq9 S+eFo31mkuCueUnc25pzU7rDfkf70kKn+4239y/2jHb9oHVQIlfpqTmElZFlLRgg wRED8jcnzdS6R/X+GweG+Zo6dRMvOwQ8UOCj9zhO6D64qEYM+s+RYlnVhHcQSpAj X/ftHwIUyUxOBjSbCJK9TolNBoNJmvke3qAI/T694rgn62pvawnbeTVlnBPicjgY JC98Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=45H16ckAcIqzVC2GiGe3hS8scRl4dLu8y6UAyh0FF /c=; b=KPk2wHS4FZmadiMZOqrl8NzDd2yqVvOiXtWj+Q/K/9H+qjjBcgAPPKs2S 3Va1zEzu2cYODgQOXOeZRSNQvb1RabiArly/eOxOEHMiyf83uxEAmlEiEOfjkGm/ 1L1A2QaEBBV3Ib/JFJurQihfPeJezP8YKCbejFKwDuj9vQaethWunj0UVwlzc/g6 peDjMgK3U/05GKP2z2ehpIJ1TEmpHWM7iZn31Hn1LVkrHjbz0RXLMKwi1DaEQzG1 kck69JkLMJHfYgjW6G0FRWch58Vo2FZF1QaGAKXMRG1ZzAmye4z3mUFKEAtx5jWX 73P1faJPwovJ+5STKI9QzJHlKJOzQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:YFgSYFo7XxjX8hqcBpDs9um1PaaGUAg37P5rYJfdrKXxp3Skf386kQ> <xme:YFgSYHo9zfrxKgDd5yz4VfWKHR6eXipSOJyCI0wYDZKukdcc7W5x5DOde9CQb8lKq 89Is0VRRYfwpUbWDg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdelgdelvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmh dthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhkucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhn ohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekuddvleejgeethfevkefhtdevkeelve ekfeegleduiefhudegvdeiuefftddthfenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhm nhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudduledrudejrdduheekrddvhedunecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgv th
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YFgSYCMhd541Wj_ITXUEKiMq_wD2f8nCKt8QG9LWu8O92JOpbMgpag> <xmx:YFgSYA76pavMgCd-XrvRVskDbr2sjSwSvS-ba4-QyFCflBhSbXXWSQ> <xmx:YFgSYE7Qfxk4LxDa-bmvvpsR4T4raDqQrerV5MOwPxA0ZPkzdnx1Iw> <xmx:Y1gSYClwUNwM3pdVhG9WR3oBX6GVsTRueTaGMwklSf1pxZh3vOAxGg>
Received: from [192.168.7.30] (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ACEF724005A; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 01:23:27 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR00MB08458672E57AACC3BB8367EEF0BC9@DM6PR00MB0845.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:23:23 +1100
Cc: "gabriel@sullice.com" <gabriel@sullice.com>, "httpapi@ietf.org" <httpapi@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <529C556A-1270-4B10-80F8-3D51FFEB8356@mnot.net>
References: <CAO0N9X4TTcQTk_Nrd9hYCs3wFkx6pNfsXaig7BVFzvVFQU-1+Q@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR00MB08458672E57AACC3BB8367EEF0BC9@DM6PR00MB0845.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
To: Darrel Miller <Darrel.Miller=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/WoGArPK3fVQJaqbP1BhDX6G2uqk>
Subject: Re: [httpapi] Link relationship types for authentication
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:23:36 -0000

Just to clarify -- that list can give advice about the details of registration and whether or not the use 'fits' link relations, but the discussion of the proposal should happen in the relevant community -- i.e., here.

Cheers,


> On 26 Jan 2021, at 1:52 pm, Darrel Miller <Darrel.Miller=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hey Gabriel,
> 
> 
> From: httpapi <httpapi-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Gabriel Sullice <gabriel@sullice.com>
> Has this group considered working on this draft: Link relationship types for authentication
> 
> 
> I missed this when Evert originally posted it.  From a quick review they seem like they would be useful additions to the Link Relation Types.   Do you know if Evert posted this to the Link Relations Type mailing list?  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/link-relations/
> 
> They would seem like a good place to get feedback.
> 
> Darrel
> -- 
> httpapi mailing list
> httpapi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status