IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [httpapi] Martin Duke's Block on charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: (with BLOCK)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 10 September 2020 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271BC3A0E29; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YbEn1PPAlIsf; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2C3D3A0BEA; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id d190so7998305iof.3; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aGooy6gho/6p5iqvKOspbqTOwhLc3RUyu3m83dsShBw=; b=iv0MGzhfxvm43KHX8wPr4Kv6sYBylH5LsTf9F9VyXHLu9kA5NfzNKVhAiQUstXKDjl 1/u4tkkdIuj8pW++8BMDqoJoa3it6x49gf9luPm+jiWg9drOJ2OCGhBwfpkd1XTDBrcY HCjK5XEl3cMv4eLTMbr0fgxoTeco+OfSCcZg7YeHawr0jwcmRbuRGu/P0xqBGrKlTWzN wzmF6FZMBbA3U86QIAX4I0xCS4/1H/Umpg2GLVXE+mkJajKOSZSZGLEI8SiVyqpOsTgh 9F3leWfl4/N+vmjuLJ8kJU+0A13vvd6u5Rr/4+lZDd/W8/e+1qFCjImefou5Ppq2PF8A py+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aGooy6gho/6p5iqvKOspbqTOwhLc3RUyu3m83dsShBw=; b=dbwDLLUhkECBem8RC3InxcNTAIheW7U+WWy+4mrzKhh8v85hm69zNMV4Zd5SQDzIFB WWfDCL/QK8hvwAud+MAiPFVC1DiFhPVqoeejD22nlVVcpxMUvg3hIBW1nbOXZ8N8uyS2 Dc3fpC0lmWI3y5Szkf3/v2ixaGAnKiJowAANnTUh9rXXX9TcdhBr29/FIzFFKY9B6FoW HR63P9J8QsSjuLuFe+Blw9L7WS6ja1qLz7XhhriKM6DvW+HX0o2dZSxQuTbFopBjLAHD ymC9o9Kp/kACPMzp3qYrtFVmPvua52gN7oAQc5tJ958hO7j/IyrspdQNPviJLpwmiuZW mjeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qxHu/y8GRdveglAygOqOjzZ5C494aiGpd/NURj8apCTZl8Lz0 GyGSxhtnJZMOlHdqySE9er3iZaf88rjwY/QKfzgU6tft
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLs9EhVRyGB/mregs2YS13eyCzVewcklG+l35hkw9mX6ZEFjufMw04woonQ5C3DIl4DxEKUfEZlTXcV/k0yQw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2d90:: with SMTP id k16mr8418319iow.19.1599758752981; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159958075822.806.6403222206022210649@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJ+avKC05HEkRXiw9qwgzMvGtwqaj=mreCc+k3WkNem99Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+avKC05HEkRXiw9qwgzMvGtwqaj=mreCc+k3WkNem99Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:25:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxT-JH5VqAnn+J+JRYMLEAGsM4-XCE+Nd8kiH_NAT42W_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, httpapi@ietf.org, httpapi-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000032a7b105aef8dc58"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/XtbJG9e-fAP_lRY3kZTWAZ14lq4>
Subject: Re: [httpapi] Martin Duke's Block on charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:25:55 -0000

I'm in the same boat as Alissa. I can live with this is a provisional
standing WG that takes whatever comes in, for now, but if there's a
probation period it should be in the charter.

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:31 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> The -00-01 version of the proposed charter includes Mark's latest
> edits.  Martin, will you check it and let us know what you think?
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Martin Duke via Datatracker
> <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> > charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: Block
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-httpapi/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > BLOCK:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > I certainly support creation of a working group of this nature; however,
> from
> > the charter I have no idea what portion of this large problem space
> constitutes
> > the short-term objectives of this group.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email