Re: [httpapi] Should we adopt linkset media types and link relation?

Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net> Sat, 02 January 2021 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <erik.wilde@dret.net>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B113A1001 for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 15:44:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M7vu27EndbhP for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 15:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postoffice.gristmillmedia.com (dret.net [209.188.86.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5DAC3A0FF7 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 15:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [108.205.51.24] (port=58778 helo=dretpro.attlocal.net) by postoffice.gristmillmedia.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <erik.wilde@dret.net>) id 1kvqZY-0008Jv-Nc; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 18:44:36 -0500
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
Cc: "httpapi@ietf.org" <httpapi@ietf.org>
References: <48058830-D096-4DBE-8476-0487544D880E@akamai.com> <e7e0e81b-0c84-a0d8-3ecc-bfc75f852e0a@dret.net> <CAOywMHfRWs=AcH3SKO9bUTMfrWGNOptsd_E4TOcctTJxH-EsiA@mail.gmail.com> <49ff5ddf-da27-efe5-fa86-66860d2a72c3@dret.net> <A9461DC5-36BF-4D00-B347-5AD402C02C8B@akamai.com> <38e52708-6be8-ca6a-3021-9ad64bcbc7f0@dret.net> <D3672D91-E3A2-456C-9594-CFA51BA2E375@akamai.com>
From: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>
Message-ID: <0f2f6dd3-7a9e-5c80-1b93-de85dff3c89a@dret.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 15:44:33 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D3672D91-E3A2-456C-9594-CFA51BA2E375@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - postoffice.gristmillmedia.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dret.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: authenticated_id: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/aSaXjHtmthu1BFLBq8zadKBd5B4>
Subject: Re: [httpapi] Should we adopt linkset media types and link relation?
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 23:44:41 -0000

hello rich.

On 2021-01-02 14:37, Salz, Rich wrote:
>      i am not sure this would be particularly helpful except for people with
>      a very specific knowledge of CoRE. asking the list: anybody having an
>      opinion whether including a brief comparison with CoRE would be helpful
>      or not?
> 
> It can be in a draft and then removed, or it can be marked "please remove this section before publication as an RFC"  But I expect that heading off a likely IESG question would be a good thing to do.

fair enough. we'll turn that into the honorary first issue once we have 
the repo for managing the draft.

thanks and cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@dret.net |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |