IETF Logo Mail Archive

[httpapi] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header-05.txt> (The Deprecation HTTP Header Field) to Proposed Standard

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 24 August 2024 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A031C15108A for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 23:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ySymBg-2952r for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 23:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D146C1519A6 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 23:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1724480390; x=1725085190; i=julian.reschke@gmx.de; bh=IfsMbJ2bUMzb76tELjv4poBcotlXN26B+4hRMBSQyZw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To: References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=lhFnnwLTtGff9GPp0Ohny0uHlXfK8bWVJION388vhHSJC+KOcUNvalEX4n0nrfZq hXx4c5Xc+PjkqIeptrg+dmzzu6zhExVWISWw9ou5K6+Qp/hvlDa5g16M3zLzAke9z u9r+Pm1gUwWTbXMaE77RkrNPzp2eGBUl/xF23QaAN5/9zecn2bgwsrPWZmN+yX5AO YmEq192M3tM5hYW0auPK4d5O6+NhUhoNqgXrAJ3lQPKCzdVuNRMF4VOXPNWQLvFzt N+GUH69/cZLbMpmkBt30qk8OEtq5nAJIv9ePULKMSFV+PtTy5ghc1DRFWM2hdP9OY SAty8gBjvhLmb3TwSw==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from [192.168.178.182] ([217.251.131.108]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mf078-1sBP7U1oSI-00eabg for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:19:50 +0200
Message-ID: <b46ef258-cad2-45ea-a210-9253a3b6cb34@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:19:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: httpapi@ietf.org
References: <172442671239.127588.8133983778126810167@dt-datatracker-584cd6c8dd-fvr2f>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <172442671239.127588.8133983778126810167@dt-datatracker-584cd6c8dd-fvr2f>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/2TqYhdGwnxv+5RRk/kI9XSQKfNuFz0leNAfpBeCHK3KfaG2VNF Z7qxe+mVA1XPuCEDTVpdvTvG409n7+aCG0aW/wTrafvdq1Tme+ZhQ3xpeGycVbq+P2DbovE w+yZ95OU9tYSgiABLFiGace2iuf/tIxvs0A/UuxzX1+UOccO7EUytA7kuPdHMD+Rv/n1elA L9eB+hv+wlC53gVFqajqw==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:PbryWad6KFM=;IEEH4eSlHuSjNaeQNMsLaBvEwXf u9QTohDpoBa8YBqO82Z/Mzg5Ret+EWd5J9XEufqqa/zvBCqAIudPUIk8RAS+oRpZEsyou5aKQ iGQiY3P2StlDuGtzISIB3bjdVdptrbU35vAWwgDDiDte+/OAPpFwlveLQ15icxQaE3j/+c4sh dYgKZat1ilbSeqbU8jd90THRapWRzwLnu5aPgGyC2QAPVApb8PmJvvuFTMZyRI1vbuNmlxf+G ewAiFaOgyG8nhc5tUriaIiNjd2NO78vRAdqcZFBYVnVhT93kYwHnC0UAnH/Q1FHt2Y0Wn10yD 5J65FM+g3ZqV9P5sbE8+ZCJQAAUPz/onqAZDtkuLi9O5WN9w31TNkUiDpLfPMyI1t+6ZEAmG/ sq86EH/vG6xVpetUulWjfq7Epo0JcvwrlpH/tlZy0Pe5Es8EvkjYw6aH+Uw3/O1cQ2EFkOXiv ACwU+JpVCkgfv0qdOWH5J+5MuQYoySvuBl4R+4AtYLtVypCSyGLeRdoOYm0PetlRpvVWDrYvE Ct0s5mnLrSdpDGi1w2vMt+InmYMWSES5qvgGNTQjNIbD2rKcaRCU+hRdcHyMX3U+TSPhvfjbN v+NCkn1EttFgyx5QnZGAe8PEcZazJyfH9LfeRHofV59b/v/IOi8iC/ciJJzYu52EfbvYW9QFZ c/Ew4qlZV1FFpxCm7xAyhq5IAcSf12hK26NvywMaukbgAfdXZW+A6uz7s+a0v8700CqvimsUt LKRZWy8c2u2J+p9Ateuu1PDa/XqAztDuTVOJi8LZCSPI3vcB4ErAkgkNkCkBrFBSr1TBWXlxu qzf6FiZ3t5CrqL/lB5JutLog==
Message-ID-Hash: T5ZA7TM53IWQZKIREB4CQ7XD5YPNCQ3Y
X-Message-ID-Hash: T5ZA7TM53IWQZKIREB4CQ7XD5YPNCQ3Y
X-MailFrom: julian.reschke@gmx.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [httpapi] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header-05.txt> (The Deprecation HTTP Header Field) to Proposed Standard
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/bkQbrYhbREF-Lf9GtGZ9I1J6Ba8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:httpapi-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:httpapi-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:httpapi-leave@ietf.org>

On 23.08.2024 17:25, The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Building Blocks for HTTP APIs WG
> (httpapi) to consider the following document: - 'The Deprecation HTTP Header
> Field'
>    <draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header-05.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2024-09-06. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> ...

One minor issue: the document refers to and uses ABNF without listing
RFC 5234 as reference (maybe a transitive reference through AF was
assumed?).

Best regards, Julian

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status