[httpapi] Weekly github digest (HTTPAPI WG Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 02 May 2021 07:51 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAEB3A228C for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 May 2021 00:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=cBslVw5X; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=iFdKP4oY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fo7gZL2tAxSd for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 May 2021 00:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F3D3A228B for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 May 2021 00:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF401408 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 May 2021 03:42:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 May 2021 03:42:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm2; bh=Io8etzU1sRG dgSt39yxNjBmAlDxsMylxbngsZuFvJLw=; b=cBslVw5XOmgyYHqqTiNiXGgQscE pXrxrYfj6/JGBXk+GD/idB4uH5lv5xeJMDrRDZeybL3pgijmEKndw0sYZiCYaGOk fYtkDS2GsmnE9nZTSugjvk3dk4Uwv0T3pEdKflz02LLXFCe6lgAI0FPLyRUoYmU6 w+sZCUv0JeEXpTp0V3ziXQT5ZO8zG+ty0eKyNDup7PR0vbj6r4w9vU8oA1QfV4GN ugd2CRFgGP0ZWAVXdfOIvPmXB6uuh3i69qA3+VqXMwAX1HWtbb1emLPsh8NywTS8 iX+iWwYXWjcE4xtyVhvbmq1DqcvOZ1LXZo9Jz5LU3Pz4Navke1ij1YpF1iA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=Io8etzU1sRGdgSt39yxNjBmAlDxsMylxbngsZuFvJLw=; b=iFdKP4oY /h5SEVKxGVQuJNc3BwAlf9PtPHzrlWatBWj8lSYbrHWtbgo8qWj3kJd/woLpN51/ AttxA1lu3JJvpjEUI4nIUEvmt1f3LxD6LqLX4ylDPwbWM8zDHP78jyeWgWywmXsL Qh5ZE3S3hKKdv4TK1dMcRaU/6O8HmEqbuyEzPX0FDj0QdgwDSdb7OZwCAky4TrJV QOTZsb6Mvmf5agNkhf9bZ7r9tyaJDntM2LU1g/cS7rVmLtxwPjRQvtoHmZD50fq1 b5vEqHjLV7nbwQ/InmGuR4D1Ls0ZdeYMSgiblJLfkOBw7FyJ3Tw9sCj8Yfj0+vUh J0Va0GeI125Nxg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:1VeOYCVtx-IyE7_DRvOHjhIG2LwsMaCmLOuIB8TBaTA5v42P72vdxw> <xme:1VeOYOnSCrfNiaOzrV6Gy4aU_mvLA-chsZmgDwnX6WTg8SdVVtGxXSicmgKUTxY7j DcaCf98v_ck13J7rw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdefuddggeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucfkphepudefrdekvddruddrudekleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvg ht
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:1VeOYGZ7RR32Ca_v8yhrvbJ1z-FtHZckMkta-ipRtUaiZKxJJUY2Yg> <xmx:1VeOYJWaXl7a0pEi_uRRcRlPKZIGU9E9Y3UTQOmptZaGS9mUm8NDwQ> <xmx:1VeOYMlzySAIrj0g3cs1uZor8TEnf709oRBDUo4j9PPlqAcjLuYArQ> <xmx:1VeOYIuDFOoN1TXGsMmJAINxtT_hxLrX0GnJnT2a1hgfA9x3eo-59A>
Received: from fv-az201-515.ett4tu3jvdse5ovc2mkgjqcs5a.bx.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [13.82.1.189]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 May 2021 03:42:13 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============4539906512494470184=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: httpapi@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20210502075101.93F3D3A228B@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 00:51:01 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/ilWV0l1qb_TDrAMl2Js1ijUKmcY>
Subject: [httpapi] Weekly github digest (HTTPAPI WG Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 07:51:07 -0000
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header (+0/-1/💬4)
2 issues received 4 new comments:
- #8 Definition of resource context (2 by darrelmiller, dret)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/issues/8
- #7 Deprecation scope (2 by darrelmiller, dret)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/issues/7
1 issues closed:
- Clarification on multiplicity of deprecation links https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/issues/9
* ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers (+1/-3/💬2)
1 issues created:
- Editorial: reorganize ##Goals (by ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/50
2 issues received 2 new comments:
- #44 tightly coupling with status code (1 by ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/44 [info]
- #40 Security Considerations (1 by ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/40 [design]
3 issues closed:
- Performance concerns on returning fields on every response https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/27 [has-pr]
- Security Considerations https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/40 [design]
- tightly coupling with status code https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/44 [info]
* ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis (+1/-0/💬9)
1 issues created:
- null type (by mnot)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/19
5 issues received 9 new comments:
- #19 null type (3 by asbjornu, mnot)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/19
- #16 Deprecating media type? (3 by dret, mnot)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/16
- #12 Problem Details Object for Warning (1 by serialseb)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/12
- #11 Should 'type' definitely be required to be a URI? (1 by mnot)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/11
- #6 Multiple problems (1 by serialseb)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/6
Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers (+1/-2/💬12)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Fix: #42 #44. Clarification on returning status codes. (by ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/51
4 pull requests received 12 new comments:
- #48 Fix: #41. Clarify interactions with 3xx. (2 by darrelmiller, ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/48
- #34 Fix: #23. Cap conveyed throughput. See #19. (5 by ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/34
- #32 Improve spec goal. See #26 (3 by darrelmiller, ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/32
- #28 Fix: #27. Performance concerns on providing ratelimit headers (2 by darrelmiller, ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/28
2 pull requests merged:
- Improve spec goal. See #26
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/32
- Fix: #27. Performance concerns on providing ratelimit headers
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/28
* ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis (+1/-0/💬0)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Warn about relative URIs in "type" and "instance" (by mnot)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/pull/20
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/linkset
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/wg-materials
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis
- [httpapi] Weekly github digest (HTTPAPI WG Activi… Repository Activity Summary Bot