From nobody Sun May  2 00:51:12 2021
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAEB3A228C
 for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  2 May 2021 00:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=mnot.net header.b=cBslVw5X;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=iFdKP4oY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id fo7gZL2tAxSd for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Sun,  2 May 2021 00:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [64.147.123.19])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F3D3A228B
 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sun,  2 May 2021 00:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43])
 by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF401408
 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sun,  2 May 2021 03:42:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 May 2021 03:42:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=
 content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm2; bh=Io8etzU1sRG
 dgSt39yxNjBmAlDxsMylxbngsZuFvJLw=; b=cBslVw5XOmgyYHqqTiNiXGgQscE
 pXrxrYfj6/JGBXk+GD/idB4uH5lv5xeJMDrRDZeybL3pgijmEKndw0sYZiCYaGOk
 fYtkDS2GsmnE9nZTSugjvk3dk4Uwv0T3pEdKflz02LLXFCe6lgAI0FPLyRUoYmU6
 w+sZCUv0JeEXpTp0V3ziXQT5ZO8zG+ty0eKyNDup7PR0vbj6r4w9vU8oA1QfV4GN
 ugd2CRFgGP0ZWAVXdfOIvPmXB6uuh3i69qA3+VqXMwAX1HWtbb1emLPsh8NywTS8
 iX+iWwYXWjcE4xtyVhvbmq1DqcvOZ1LXZo9Jz5LU3Pz4Navke1ij1YpF1iA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to
 :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
 fm2; bh=Io8etzU1sRGdgSt39yxNjBmAlDxsMylxbngsZuFvJLw=; b=iFdKP4oY
 /h5SEVKxGVQuJNc3BwAlf9PtPHzrlWatBWj8lSYbrHWtbgo8qWj3kJd/woLpN51/
 AttxA1lu3JJvpjEUI4nIUEvmt1f3LxD6LqLX4ylDPwbWM8zDHP78jyeWgWywmXsL
 Qh5ZE3S3hKKdv4TK1dMcRaU/6O8HmEqbuyEzPX0FDj0QdgwDSdb7OZwCAky4TrJV
 QOTZsb6Mvmf5agNkhf9bZ7r9tyaJDntM2LU1g/cS7rVmLtxwPjRQvtoHmZD50fq1
 b5vEqHjLV7nbwQ/InmGuR4D1Ls0ZdeYMSgiblJLfkOBw7FyJ3Tw9sCj8Yfj0+vUh
 J0Va0GeI125Nxg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:1VeOYCVtx-IyE7_DRvOHjhIG2LwsMaCmLOuIB8TBaTA5v42P72vdxw>
 <xme:1VeOYOnSCrfNiaOzrV6Gy4aU_mvLA-chsZmgDwnX6WTg8SdVVtGxXSicmgKUTxY7j
 DcaCf98v_ck13J7rw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdefuddggeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
 uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc
 fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu
 tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse
 hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg
 fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg
 homhenucfkphepudefrdekvddruddrudekleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecu
 rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvg
 ht
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:1VeOYGZ7RR32Ca_v8yhrvbJ1z-FtHZckMkta-ipRtUaiZKxJJUY2Yg>
 <xmx:1VeOYJWaXl7a0pEi_uRRcRlPKZIGU9E9Y3UTQOmptZaGS9mUm8NDwQ>
 <xmx:1VeOYMlzySAIrj0g3cs1uZor8TEnf709oRBDUo4j9PPlqAcjLuYArQ>
 <xmx:1VeOYIuDFOoN1TXGsMmJAINxtT_hxLrX0GnJnT2a1hgfA9x3eo-59A>
Received: from
 fv-az201-515.ett4tu3jvdse5ovc2mkgjqcs5a.bx.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown
 [13.82.1.189]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA
 for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sun,  2 May 2021 03:42:13 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="===============4539906512494470184=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: httpapi@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20210502075101.93F3D3A228B@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun,  2 May 2021 00:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/ilWV0l1qb_TDrAMl2Js1ijUKmcY>
Subject: [httpapi] Weekly github digest (HTTPAPI WG Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>,
 <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>,
 <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 07:51:07 -0000

--===============4539906512494470184==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"




Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header (+0/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC4)
  2 issues received 4 new comments:
  - #8 Definition of resource context (2 by darrelmiller, dret)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/issues/8=20
  - #7 Deprecation scope (2 by darrelmiller, dret)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/issues/7=20

  1 issues closed:
  - Clarification on multiplicity of deprecation links https://github.com/i=
etf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/issues/9=20

* ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers (+1/-3/=F0=9F=92=AC2)
  1 issues created:
  - Editorial: reorganize ##Goals (by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/50=20

  2 issues received 2 new comments:
  - #44 tightly coupling with status code (1 by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/44 [info]=20
  - #40 Security Considerations (1 by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/40 [design]=
=20

  3 issues closed:
  - Performance concerns on returning fields on every response https://gith=
ub.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/27 [has-pr]=20
  - Security Considerations https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-he=
aders/issues/40 [design]=20
  - tightly coupling with status code https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ra=
telimit-headers/issues/44 [info]=20

* ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC9)
  1 issues created:
  - null type (by mnot)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/19=20

  5 issues received 9 new comments:
  - #19 null type (3 by asbjornu, mnot)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/19=20
  - #16 Deprecating media type? (3 by dret, mnot)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/16=20
  - #12 Problem Details Object for Warning (1 by serialseb)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/12=20
  - #11 Should 'type' definitely be required to be a URI? (1 by mnot)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/11=20
  - #6 Multiple problems (1 by serialseb)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/6=20



Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers (+1/-2/=F0=9F=92=AC12)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Fix: #42 #44. Clarification on returning status codes. (by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/51=20

  4 pull requests received 12 new comments:
  - #48 Fix: #41. Clarify interactions with 3xx. (2 by darrelmiller, ioggst=
ream)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/48=20
  - #34 Fix: #23. Cap conveyed throughput. See #19. (5 by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/34=20
  - #32 Improve spec goal. See #26 (3 by darrelmiller, ioggstream)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/32=20
  - #28 Fix: #27. Performance concerns on providing ratelimit headers (2 by=
 darrelmiller, ioggstream)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/28=20

  2 pull requests merged:
  - Improve spec goal. See #26
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/32=20
  - Fix: #27. Performance concerns on providing ratelimit headers
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/28=20

* ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Warn about relative URIs in "type" and "instance" (by mnot)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/pull/20=20


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/linkset
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/wg-materials
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis

--===============4539906512494470184==
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!doctype html>
<html lang=3D"en">
<head>
<meta charset=3D"utf-8">
<title>Weekly github digest (HTTPAPI WG Activity Summary)</title>
<style>
body { font-family: Gotham, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;=
 font-size: 14px; }
h2 { margin-top: 3em; color: #A52A2A; font-style: italic; font-weight: norm=
al; }
h3 { margin-bottom:0; margin-top: 2em; font-size: 1.2em; }
h1+h2 { margin-top: 1em; }
a { color: #bb6219; text-decoration: none; }
li { margin-bottom: .35em; }
.repos { margin-bottom: 0; margin-top:0; line-height: 1.2; }
.new { color: red; }
.label { display: inline;
	padding: .2em .6em .3em;
	font-size: 75%;
	font-weight: 700;
	line-height: 1;
	color: #fff;
	text-align: center;
	white-space: nowrap;
	vertical-align: baseline;
	border-radius: .25em;
}
</style>
</head>

<body>
<h1>Sunday May 02, 2021</h1>

<p>Events without label "editorial"</p>

<h2>Issues</h2>

<h3>ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header (+0/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC4)</h3>

  <p>2 issues received 4 new comments:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#8 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/i=
ssues/8">Definition of resource context</a> (2 by darrelmiller, dret) </li>
 =20
  <li>#7 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/i=
ssues/7">Deprecation scope</a> (2 by darrelmiller, dret) </li>
  </ul>

  <p>1 issues closed:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#9 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header/i=
ssues/9">Clarification on multiplicity of deprecation links</a> </li>
  </ul>

<h3>ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers (+1/-3/=F0=9F=92=AC2)</h3>
  <p class=3D"new">1 issues created:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#50 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/i=
ssues/50">Editorial: reorganize ##Goals</a> (by ioggstream) </li>
  </ul>

  <p>2 issues received 2 new comments:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#44 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/i=
ssues/44">tightly coupling with status code</a> (1 by ioggstream) <span cla=
ss=3D"label" style=3D"background-color: #bfdadc; color: #000000">info</span=
> </li>
 =20
  <li>#40 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/i=
ssues/40">Security Considerations</a> (1 by ioggstream) <span class=3D"labe=
l" style=3D"background-color: #1d76db; color: #ffffff">design</span> </li>
  </ul>

  <p>3 issues closed:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#27 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/i=
ssues/27">Performance concerns on returning fields on every response</a> <s=
pan class=3D"label" style=3D"background-color: #72B70D; color: #000000">has=
-pr</span> </li>
 =20
  <li>#40 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/i=
ssues/40">Security Considerations</a> <span class=3D"label" style=3D"backgr=
ound-color: #1d76db; color: #ffffff">design</span> </li>
 =20
  <li>#44 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/i=
ssues/44">tightly coupling with status code</a> <span class=3D"label" style=
=3D"background-color: #bfdadc; color: #000000">info</span> </li>
  </ul>

<h3>ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC9)</h3>
  <p class=3D"new">1 issues created:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#19 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/1=
9">null type</a> (by mnot) </li>
  </ul>

  <p>5 issues received 9 new comments:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#19 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/1=
9">null type</a> (3 by asbjornu, mnot) </li>
 =20
  <li>#16 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/1=
6">Deprecating media type?</a> (3 by dret, mnot) </li>
 =20
  <li>#12 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/1=
2">Problem Details Object for Warning</a> (1 by serialseb) </li>
 =20
  <li>#11 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/1=
1">Should &#x27;type&#x27; definitely be required to be a URI?</a> (1 by mn=
ot) </li>
 =20
  <li>#6 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/6"=
>Multiple problems</a> (1 by serialseb) </li>
  </ul>




<h2>Pull requests</h2>
<h3>ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers (+1/-2/=F0=9F=92=AC12)</h3>
  <p class=3D"new">1 pull requests submitted:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#51 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/p=
ull/51">Fix: #42 #44. Clarification on returning status codes.</a> (by iogg=
stream) </li>
  </ul>

  <p>4 pull requests received 12 new comments:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#48 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/p=
ull/48">Fix: #41. Clarify interactions with 3xx.</a> (2 by darrelmiller, io=
ggstream) </li>
 =20
  <li>#34 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/p=
ull/34">Fix: #23. Cap conveyed throughput. See #19.</a> (5 by ioggstream) <=
/li>
 =20
  <li>#32 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/p=
ull/32">Improve spec goal. See #26</a> (3 by darrelmiller, ioggstream) </li>
 =20
  <li>#28 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/p=
ull/28">Fix: #27. Performance concerns on providing ratelimit headers</a> (=
2 by darrelmiller, ioggstream) </li>
  </ul>

  <p>2 pull requests merged:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#32 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/p=
ull/32">Improve spec goal. See #26</a> </li>
 =20
  <li>#28 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/p=
ull/28">Fix: #27. Performance concerns on providing ratelimit headers</a> <=
/li>
  </ul>

<h3>ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0)</h3>
  <p class=3D"new">1 pull requests submitted:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>#20 <a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/pull/20"=
>Warn about relative URIs in &quot;type&quot; and &quot;instance&quot;</a> =
(by mnot) </li>
  </ul>




<h2>Repositories tracked by this digest:</h2>
<ul class=3D"repos">
  <li><a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header">htt=
ps://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header</a></li>
  <li><a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers">http=
s://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers</a></li>
  <li><a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/linkset">https://github=
.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/linkset</a></li>
  <li><a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/wg-materials">https://g=
ithub.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/wg-materials</a></li>
  <li><a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis">https://git=
hub.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis</a></li>
  </ul>
</body>
</html>

--===============4539906512494470184==--

