Re: [httpapi] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 09 September 2020 18:56 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B22D3A0CCB; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QclqW2SpsGTn; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-f178.google.com (mail-il1-f178.google.com [209.85.166.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C514D3A0CB3; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-f178.google.com with SMTP id t18so2733312ilp.5; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g40Zzl64+6JpYKuewn4s9UWxIFRS/Ao0C9mizgi+Vsg=; b=lwHOo4ggM4SIF54H5HX7Xegq/dRRE0NwNq18OnL3MF+nWFxgNbriA60Daji68KYVKE Wjs+rEpbP8ubDKNv9LWffCBYhzb56XX9TJKLGdEYCWRPJDo+CN9QfgiZ7TIzCQVYllCh ExjFzs9B5FQYswK4wikujsWPBtBtVDQN1UHnhmhI/JwM+871UrIy4VhQ0qDKSR7KzUNX L+iPitRvGyE4/prlovkjWZal0XZsBlPQkM/zvPVK2saKza++aAIAKBvZgRJKNgC7PhEx Cgvmm0fupuomaz2zvC5yL9d6Gb4yR8Xzzqi1dHlU0wBMaZ5b7rynZvzkZM1eSDJr5F/K 8Yaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fgU37Qm2Ob5BsDUbAjQIE568xRJVYaB4zpbL0t9a/Tl/dRCEG xk+9+8QAEafY975bHQ7iVIj8rYZ/OkK+HIYCLBCoseEuyibxYA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpo1A4wQV9DQoj5AvENNb4tGpqSQw+we6ficamLQZ3D0BK8gF94c0snl4R4rpcSZUYXqib5mT5HUj/UexJqGI=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d906:: with SMTP id s6mr4693300iln.152.1599677767009; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159967746837.8437.7601380417417968185@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159967746837.8437.7601380417417968185@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:55:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLtB4U6N6BCb5=Mndu98XHpCFxDP5p0M26uPHsJcoeROg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, httpapi@ietf.org, httpapi-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/zUtfB-bdZMEcbBwT6EoBkyX0D8o>
Subject: Re: [httpapi] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:56:10 -0000
> ** (Like Martin and Alissa) I’m having trouble discriminating what work comes > to HTTPbis as opposed to this proposed WG. As written, does all HTTP for web > browser go to HTTPbis; and machine-to-machine comes here? Indeed; I've heard this clearly, and I'm putting Mark specifically on the "to" line to ask for some edits to clarify this, especially, along with other questions that have been raised. Thanks, all, Barry
- [httpapi] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [httpapi] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on cha… Barry Leiba
- Re: [httpapi] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on cha… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [httpapi] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on cha… Barry Leiba