Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 19 May 2020 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706493A11BF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3VC1kFqJNtSt for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF63C3A11BC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jbAgx-0003nO-72 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:26:31 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 22:26:31 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jbAgx-0003nO-72@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1jbAgw-0003mY-60 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:26:30 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1jbAgu-0004xD-OO for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:26:30 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCE63A11B3; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, mnot@mnot.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.130.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <158992717357.24693.34103195332955483@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 15:26:14 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.44; envelope-from=noreply@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO=2.095, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1jbAgu-0004xD-OO 1be9f08d192e0dc278d22f8ed8fc86fe
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/158992717357.24693.34103195332955483@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37674
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[ nits ]]

[ section 1 ]
* "requires external device" -> "requires an external device"?

[ section 2.2 ]
* "indicate user agents" -> "indicate to user agents"?

[ section 3.1 ]
* s/sh-list/sf-list/g

[ section 4.3 ]
* "we can remove" -> perhaps another wording that doesn't require "we"

* "unless the opt-in origin has explicitly delegated permission to another
  origin": is this delegation mechanism documented somewhere that should
  be referenced here?

* "is challenging and likely" -> "may be challenging or even"