Re: RFC6265bis status

Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> Wed, 05 October 2016 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613FF129432 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.016
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.016 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vo3RJj7LQL2X for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F006E1293E3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1brpdw-0002PN-HM for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 17:06:08 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 17:06:08 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1brpdw-0002PN-HM@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <dveditz@mozilla.com>) id 1brpdt-0002Og-89 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 17:06:05 +0000
Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com ([209.85.218.54]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <dveditz@mozilla.com>) id 1brpdr-0004t7-Ct for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 17:06:04 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id r126so280564266oib.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/m99v8Z2e53zVIfR3ZKyXxs9+NoGsNaNpgzxgLnlDwA=; b=AqfN4YEdCGxcLc/ieQafQRN5PW30hm7UZhYADoSn+sBB5zvFv0lRuDrwz72ZSUkyRq 9KMCifTTiZQInzp0v1MhublxZxPompMNaCto5audr5I7ad61CEtaDsX3brLd6fwoDesZ U0N40oSnBono1yZT0wRJ1clCvBCyD5oqcDyAw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/m99v8Z2e53zVIfR3ZKyXxs9+NoGsNaNpgzxgLnlDwA=; b=iV5o/nxkIm5JVDv64OPzkXPyPcx56gqfSXOxA0mh172LymTEmPSBfsSgErZW2sBuLQ 68qa8RLwW3tZpxdoasSrN6RAXxrlvgPT7O+4jkuG2AsmN2IWeZKyE9oOCFvyoHJ9qHAu 6FR9MbklDu6epH2TXEWd0tRgCRvCLL9wDWcYagOFHYdmzq/AJn5PTlSv5Bq4VZqPZyKt ySPTmvA7cD4xhPcVW+b592gqz2WvfnpjeeWgmoKHZOWbAd3ms9SiQf/Muwi39HD9vW6E j74FOOz8PdiN06h4lteMbOL2+MhofDy6/rsoIzf/vICTjJABpFp7I7Xph7owMFebyRCR XsMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkXIVE1EZLOZUbCOFiXGCasUzL0evkjL5tWnFq0qno6Utc+a48Rr7HCkzZyAxCVzuqW/MuwmxeklDFiJQAl
X-Received: by 10.157.22.203 with SMTP id s11mr6822974ots.229.1475687136951; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.89.6 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610050751260.28134@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <2D2BCE5A-4EFD-453F-A928-40200715E226@mnot.net> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610050751260.28134@tvnag.unkk.fr>
From: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:05:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CADYDTCCrfDpHACHpg2ApOjkiFcZFfcV425FCWU9h4RTFjADwoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e21b0991d4a053e212f52"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.54; envelope-from=dveditz@mozilla.com; helo=mail-oi0-f54.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.076, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1brpdr-0004t7-Ct 1d90dc71017e654b1beb16229fef23cc
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: RFC6265bis status
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CADYDTCCrfDpHACHpg2ApOjkiFcZFfcV425FCWU9h4RTFjADwoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32489
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

​On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> wrote:

  https://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2016-09/0103.html
>
> The two points being:
>  1 - Are they two cookies or one?
>

​Those are clearly two different cookies. The one set without a domain is a
"host" cookie and will only be returned to httpbin.org. The one with the .
httpbin.org domain would also be returned to www.httpbin.org,
foo.httpbin.org, etc.

-
​Dan Veditz​