[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7725 (5181)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 09 November 2022 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD3BC15949F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:30:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.998, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wuk2ocxiyAMS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:30:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F43C1594A0 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:29:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1osgR2-00Bi7T-4k for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:27:48 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:27:48 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1osgR2-00Bi7T-4k@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>) id 1osgR1-00Bi6W-A3 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:27:47 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([50.223.129.200] helo=rfcpa.amsl.com) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>) id 1osgQz-008dVr-Ru for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:27:46 +0000
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 6446C1FD20; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:27:34 -0800 (PST)
To: bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr, tbray@textuality.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221109082734.6446C1FD20@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:27:34 -0800
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.223.129.200; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com; helo=rfcpa.amsl.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1osgQz-008dVr-Ru 3a85c37aec3f7de0e186333a35a033e7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7725 (5181)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20221109082734.6446C1FD20@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40541
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC7725, "An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5181

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported by: St├ęphane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
Date Reported: 2017-11-11
Held by: Francesca Palombini (IESG)

Section: 3

Original Text
-------------
   Link: <https://spqr.example.org/legislatione>; rel="blocked-by"


Corrected Text
--------------
   Link: <https://search.example.net/legal>; rel="blocked-by"


Notes
-----
Of course, it is hard to say from just an URL but it seems that the original "blocked-by" mentioned the authority requesting the blocking (spqr = Roman Senate and People) while the text in section 4 says "The intent is that the header be used to identify the entity actually implementing blockage, not any other entity mandating it."

Experience with the 451 crawler during the IETF 99 hackathon showed that several implementors got this wrong and used a "blocked-by" indicating the authority.

[It could be a good idea to have two links, one for the authority and one for the implementor, but this is outside the scope of this errata.]

--------------------------------------
RFC7725 (draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles
Publication Date    : February 2016
Author(s)           : T. Bray
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : HTTP
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG