IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 03 February 2016 04:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B8A1A035F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 20:24:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IVZHFkHpRqNs for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 20:24:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E531A0270 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 20:24:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aQov2-0005pj-Vg for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:19:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:19:52 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aQov2-0005pj-Vg@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1aQouv-0005ot-02 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:19:45 +0000
Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1aQouq-0004if-Lw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:19:44 +0000
Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id f81so42253149iof.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:19:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=R4ujY3bqEGryPiKqhpnRZ0/nx8mI9qXrkTKgsbXr9DM=; b=pLZNoHEIRjEghZwm88/TjUY5FvK4hMVI0xtqyoHyXPIuUeR6BcuFDMgBz6L90FXmlH MOd+y4Jrqk5fUqKozGmqQC+QWzljBixWg0NmcS34XELlvC5a1tDrZDg07k3q5BL0ydxJ gCaT5m2WfvfMkcGbnkw9q41zPgZCkeGkfbgS3TyHRQ1ysT2WA7qTGjor3WT1H55S3k4+ ZpI0T86VGHhpry5HMkX/kyFqvtERf/zmG4EUZQdTw5SM11xU9ELU/AbD4XnzzZdXsRpv /H5O6BcRg/6Vo6ewgm3n3E/NfCjE9QlZUYyaIKKvC+d5dR26Z3i7s5kJ1BKkVU95OELo Ynvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=R4ujY3bqEGryPiKqhpnRZ0/nx8mI9qXrkTKgsbXr9DM=; b=UyIrcHDFXVyPxAYDUI5PAFKXezRi4GxmQKSf/zUFAEc5SnnpNpamaVwz8Zf9/xlEKy oayKuetCJ4lMnu6pb1lf7zg8Yv1vgcE6YjNMHn4KACiLTfM3amTKK3Rk3M0+SmEEmYEm 6xqYwlIbKj9pdGooEnw2x94bPc6WxamwJ2892jWIZDs6FNYTSc0bLyJPo9MUgo22UniS hJgTkvl47/yeCx/i6qF1WxfHq0XEzWut0BJmuzjIMDqzYttIhUqOuWs3UDwK1wYYx9CD in93Ps1zjI4SZRjKQoqCmxo0VdIWnGbk/Pxtbf/jx3ZVhbtFVtDS7ilzsNPiW7KH/EhM /GVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORkXKNzRjhOE36tH4M/8rWULK+gwl4PZ0kY/FiTywNIsqUnnESn/+pBXmbU0tvBHE4L8BaS0MPbRKOaGA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.131.38 with SMTP id f38mr1500031iod.190.1454473154439; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:19:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.149.130 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 20:19:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56B110EE.5050705@treenet.co.nz>
References: <CANatvzxcKS46iAqAdfBHuWPt5k3XkR79NDMPPtDakOb2jPAywA@mail.gmail.com> <56A26B1E.4050303@rd.bbc.co.uk> <CANatvzyHbyrK7cjh+JsRpTR42knc6LXX7GWzj8ZEYPgv8cs49g@mail.gmail.com> <56B0F0DC.3060807@rd.bbc.co.uk> <56B110EE.5050705@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:19:14 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU=BEPC=2X1f+DKDd11CrEG1awDG=j+J-Ha3B-mTPxfvA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.169; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-io0-f169.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.836, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1aQouq-0004if-Lw 8cacc3bbb1c3573dd9b5e670f93aaada
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnU=BEPC=2X1f+DKDd11CrEG1awDG=j+J-Ha3B-mTPxfvA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31037
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 3 February 2016 at 07:26, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> That is because PUSH by itself cannot do conditional requests. Consider
> it to be the equivalent for a non-conditional request that always gets
> the 200 status response with full new object and new expiry details.

This isn't strictly true.  You can server push a conditional request,
and in fact it can be advantageous to do so.

Of course, the server doesn't always know enough about a client to
make the *right* conditional request.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email