Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push
Glen Knowles <gknowles@ieee.org> Tue, 09 February 2016 10:12 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E6C1A8838 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:12:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.28
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.28 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mXvuzRZ8lRfj for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:12:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F08BF1A882A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:12:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aT5Dw-0002xM-Fu for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:08:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:08:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aT5Dw-0002xM-Fu@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gknowles92603@gmail.com>) id 1aT5Dq-0002wC-R7 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:08:38 +0000
Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gknowles92603@gmail.com>) id 1aT5Dh-0006EM-PK for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:08:37 +0000
Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 9so12764314iom.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:08:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mlJTL67mGZc/lxjgT0f4bHB80PK/1cJmRbPAKiDPs1c=; b=0vDCXczcZda6HAbHnUW+OQCK0TeAmjWn3VL77Cet+stCYlatu+mydt5F04dnZA3dQu BwhWBO5tSyagGXfa28niuuMtDT+nWpLAFc/4SKvZABuhLNYaUYTCGLvX+H218BOV976q m5q27L7D2EL4NpQN01Mc8qSfDaM8C7uje1RvC5sDd2GYe+Z7hNM5R0EhLvGjMrSyJYw4 kMqAat9y9weaV7oAjj1umPlMrfvlGbNwkPgX6nPXk5KK3hq8Nxrnw6TgctaXeZnipvAa f3VPjOMayXg/2AfNFeNbFTyQOOaPUtrN/cnpthMDxy7IBfxDM9wdjki8l0MXpg8v1Cu8 ToTw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mlJTL67mGZc/lxjgT0f4bHB80PK/1cJmRbPAKiDPs1c=; b=qP4JmFNDC0d9ll7diHGYJkyhOK4S9VEVEMSbT+tSpbpszNpLeiKTM4RUTQU1jKyJ21 KYVlwpXSjHQrhuviICCz53CfPldIPrFZQw0JWwnNohMI7hb6YneDkYdL8i8mWJ/9DN1I EVbaWhxoThuVYD1t8dt4RguMfwbOThNF690eGlIbTj9NkYvE3iYsDx2TEppXFnMezWYf uH/BVcNFThG2evk4eMeC7cEADpuQyIy8qImdSG3+Ko5t63crfYV1C6T2C8aRFIu2uBhb eI7gaQzk/34mTE2BwPP2uV1+s9bIc19X2LQ+zHuHqQfMz0jJgtTevBHbGJlg7iCj3KBZ 8iUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mlJTL67mGZc/lxjgT0f4bHB80PK/1cJmRbPAKiDPs1c=; b=JMVoevZ7jsS7w8j3YIdKVKG6hUeFjcNywNPRjNdTlhBBqbJxeqGcqCxgPc8trg/mP4 Yu/LgjvBkFjxfk6FzPgNE6SaWxDxnSaveGT3+cJ9Gd7/jhCDmaxOCSw4+q0Fk2sUg/CW 7xHaJfcud6HVw83oPAfbEnFVmEujSrI17Hoor6xmj+DMnwpKY/0AhX7F09QIojxHB+2B guE+VVb4JzDqaAhpSnpHVHGGrXb+2kpAA3yNbZM+adVvd+zkXzLtIlVqNrSeVnymabao YZGMJek7MozEGWHO7PfVK8LQHLAGBF8hGoVQmZdDbKBx9GmNxGUvf4ST5zenUMoe9Ssc 5LsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQmJwpBlBYb9oe2dLQJXgJFYgNiHSLQYZ395Mktrt2X1gwINU+jqM2bzUyTyrnnObh3j9wtA2st1UHAXw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.26.205 with SMTP id a196mr450920ioa.131.1455012483579; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Sender: gknowles92603@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.7.21 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:08:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNo55LmT5eCS13VnuLpJDJ0eryvLTaoCy40Vpd3mq7b0LA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNo55LmT5eCS13VnuLpJDJ0eryvLTaoCy40Vpd3mq7b0LA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:08:03 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: DDBvp4TFbiEo4BIfzQEY87zrSe4
Message-ID: <CAJCH0yAayLSNjFtNin3Yh0J4rbqQqDN=H7b_z1Lh=qxtoG65hQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Glen Knowles <gknowles@ieee.org>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fd0563a4833052b537eca"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.182; envelope-from=gknowles92603@gmail.com; helo=mail-io0-f182.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.833, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aT5Dh-0006EM-PK 1a3e5852364dbfaf91e6f121a790423a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJCH0yAayLSNjFtNin3Yh0J4rbqQqDN=H7b_z1Lh=qxtoG65hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31056
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > The spec is clear the server must not send. In general that doesn't create > a requirement on the peer to throw a protocol_error when receiving. > In this case the spec does have an explicit requirement (section 5.1) that a client in the "reserved (remote)" state throw a p_e. "Receiving any type of frame other than HEADERS, RS_STREAM, or PRIORITY on a stream in this state MUST be treated as a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of type PROTOCOL_ERROR."
- Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Simone Bordet
- Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Daniel Stenberg
- Recursive HTTP/2 Push Simone Bordet
- RE: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Mike Bishop
- Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Patrick McManus
- Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Glen Knowles
- Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Simone Bordet
- Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Daniel Stenberg
- Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Alcides Viamontes E
- RE: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Lucas Pardue