Re: Report on preliminary decision on TLS 1.3 and client auth

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 25 September 2015 10:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9929E1A8956 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kn0cKQHyVC_t for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8B6F1A88D2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZfPkZ-0005Pg-Ej for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:57:07 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:57:07 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZfPkZ-0005Pg-Ej@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>) id 1ZfPkP-0005O6-P5 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:56:57 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>) id 1ZfPkK-0001nJ-Jw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:56:57 +0000
Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so13261785wic.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 02:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=zqgV9jwu6/kPkJQ1xq2Q92NG3nNN08w8nh443L1CWbQ=; b=OkCTOSMk9kEXn9pnSMn3bjP04S8fujZCEMn/qdQX1Y3eeiBdcpZMCxt1pPKJgSW/L1 g5oyBUatCku5gQCiZgcRIoL3OYOx++UwM30KKuVHdzM4TtG68ZOrRhxjtQ6coGgRAy+q hJirIiK5IZ8h9s92F3gpFG8TYhWJ3MZ0Wl4dzavZuQ+PcppVHj+nKdgWxyB4MsaFER72 2Q4bS5accPRoQ48VVcztxiV/rdM1Ud8Lt7cjHsrbJmU18BOPloYJSKFDUVrXSx1rwty4 O00pZPVSm91gGshiGTlfb/9r1SL0JacPYkyOtpgK1IY6UABJWj20H6O+xPUH7R/LPxl8 EQBg==
X-Received: by 10.194.103.103 with SMTP id fv7mr6063149wjb.152.1443174985750; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 02:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] ([46.120.13.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fs9sm2399585wic.24.2015.09.25.02.56.23 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 02:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6818.1443172702@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:56:21 +0300
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <8F0BC939-B0BD-43F6-AB41-7676B5B94054@gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnWREq6X+chcvookChGAZGxkJ6Zs_7FGwz7Mbn12XMxewQ@mail.gmail.com> <5603599F.8090303@treenet.co.nz> <CABkgnnVq9FDeGf_=JF0m0AkgfO1G3DVV2QN_aPrbYnFtfRLFrw@mail.gmail.com> <5603745A.7020509@treenet.co.nz> <6818.1443172702@critter.freebsd.dk>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.181; envelope-from=ynir.ietf@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f181.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.817, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZfPkK-0001nJ-Jw ac7007afabe1bc91c8374927459ea771
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Report on preliminary decision on TLS 1.3 and client auth
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/8F0BC939-B0BD-43F6-AB41-7676B5B94054@gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30273
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> 
> --------
> In message <5603745A.7020509@treenet.co.nz>, Amos Jeffries writes:
> 
>> Ah. Sorry I seem to have misunderstood yoru meaning of "provides the
>> proof that a server needs to regard the entire session to be authentic"
>> to mean the cert was connection-wide.
> 
> I would like to remind people that, contrary to widespread assumptions,
> HTTP doesn't have "sessions".
> 
> Sessions are typically implemented by mistaking (groups of) connections
> for a session, or by means of opaque unstandardized cookies.

Why do you call cookies unstandardized?

Yoav