Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 12 November 2016 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EB81299A9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:42:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVGnfGESgHgM for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F88129500 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c5Tpa-00021R-EJ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:38:34 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:38:34 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c5Tpa-00021R-EJ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c5TpV-0001yy-D6 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:38:29 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c5TpN-0003T8-Vo for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:38:24 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.126.213]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LdYdG-1cVE8D2MxG-00ihZX; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:37:51 +0100
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
References: <a3f3a4e0-5be3-f619-d2f8-cdda6ce2ed1e@gmx.de> <20161112081859.A68C013455@welho-filter2.welho.com> <CABkgnnWgQ1JcK9SpfeLcLdCLrzPCPkWJh-2TZgDoBhe0Fxo24Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <7ffff023-7e82-1f74-8d2d-e0f0a08d8f5a@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:37:50 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWgQ1JcK9SpfeLcLdCLrzPCPkWJh-2TZgDoBhe0Fxo24Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Sj/bZNp1oo8cceyebzEmbvW1ZCTNzNHxcN3+Yl6VcjSk0pnNzZk ZUpwO1zuEhG1e8sk0qemZtl9uhvp6a9pKYZFkdbxR0CvQOVRw7AMhWt94mQKa8wLS3u2niM CnBUSLB7IGLtkYdlVDyH8ZQbGtZG4tdAB3KUxTJ7Bh6VbOGN0zwe/1nwzU5JPp/2izt8Yk6 JSuk/Nwu17v2O3sKaWuDg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mULp6aHJP/M=:Tytd1yH7tcdyagoFFaRs2/ nfJfVIxUuiQci2qH7H2fbZLh1McoSwhdvm5LOe3B+eJonHd8+6uGTx2ziL8OocJeWWOJbAwK9 aPgfwMkrPfz0aSX0sfUbDnQzCRX1vJLGjo7hU4sJ63AYv/uQmkE9LTZSAOhLgaSfn2fAnsXKl fkmHPygE6Dhib0+yr16lrmG3B3wiNv6bpvcKTQ6UXKc2W8F/P3hgPuSyyTxhtKjnRNgSxJmA6 ysbgctjJI+FRgAsGjia8ZwDq74vVETacycaOnrbpW3H2jfh9h6Nemwx2XFB2Sy3UEwEYleREA icLWKRHU5RUqhjcXq/1zG4giWKC0IIFqVOWhccVix5vpOkMKilGT5eBYaxhL9kWKWladqd9+k uRY56qAnTs/OFbjufl5jN+imvwq28XJcxgitxWxImC5hS7kjqAIgZEOjZWoARLbpm6in752hj 7Mf0YflbaKfWhfS6IcTBH5DFpZUn+ab9JdNb8B4D7xwdfpGdza/YDfPdDuvfzWbXQXtz/UXB2 mSYkeuH0UIe/p9BHW2dWX4fZzxRpHAVv3MD+KQuZMzD4B1psDh+/l63HgvUJSzjR07hbgjeLf bPbwHdPryNNHXcP8MRT0Ayxij8jZFq9WZA+jqCqjiLs5addcBhLDY7svdDfkLlNi31N4KCnJ3 jYANzMjkq8QaqI32KmqAYdb6qRjVw6TwR1qZiMPuwNRy8pmjWpmLAlC1kg6lKCRtoUOIp4in/ DcCfMeBuzCvsN5EnifowyObas5m5jYbuXPG6DFziUJdcIrrxhB9alPgFvuwlRq75ejoVnGoQR 9sXEGyW
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.19; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.046, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c5TpN-0003T8-Vo 445223f47caa3ed2fec86e8560c2c368
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/7ffff023-7e82-1f74-8d2d-e0f0a08d8f5a@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32874
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-11-12 09:32, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 12 November 2016 at 17:18, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
>> If I understand correclty  Eric Rescorla suggest own specification:
>>
>>         Crypto-Key header field for HTTP Encrypted Content-Encoding
>>
>>
>> Essentially moving
>>
>> 3.  Crypto-Key Header Field
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04#section-3
>>
>> to that specification.
>>
>> Then also there need something to be done with examples.
>
> The alternative is to find a different solution for that draft, like
> moving the keys to the payload.

Yes, that's how it actually started.

The question remains whether a common mechanism is desirable/needed.

Best regards, Julian