IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 05 February 2013 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6831421F861A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:15:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xOfb86mz8e7R for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F5721F85AE for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U2pqd-00042n-5l for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:14:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:14:35 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U2pqd-00042n-5l@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1U2pqW-00041s-Ro for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:14:28 +0000
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.141]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1U2pqW-00086Q-1R for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:14:28 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2024; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1360098867; x=1361308467; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=i4Z5jGHY1VIYB6EOCsUu6jDachs1JuicEVakPvt+4LA=; b=LlQxmMNVL1zm9RpYT8N6Wd2EWUOAHLhx94uLVKxxVUxWpCqzNHaujCMi 9mr8JUK0ZkaC/NVj5ySwZ8vzLFCX6IcQjU/K8D7CHg0ofa+qHymX1rPHz sfqk6nfrzhIK2WrR3lrgrZmaut+UBuc37JsAqTqC6xog/Xzg8sJ0GZO4e I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFACV1EVGQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABFhki5HhZzgh8BAQEEI08GARALBAEJCgkWCwICCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcBAYgNqDeCQJAhkEiBEwOWIZBSgn8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,609,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="80272276"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2013 21:14:01 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-107-168.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-107-168.cisco.com [10.61.107.168]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r15LE0L7027913 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 21:14:01 GMT
Message-ID: <51117618.2060601@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:14:00 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <5110CB17.2000200@cisco.com> <CAP+FsNcapugpzHzuCkTmwV3C4fB=K0H3Svdoqwxqt8dNHocn8g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+FsNcapugpzHzuCkTmwV3C4fB=K0H3Svdoqwxqt8dNHocn8g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020003080608080504060404"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=144.254.224.141; envelope-from=lear@cisco.com; helo=ams-iport-2.cisco.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.483, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1U2pqW-00086Q-1R 92bde11fefb45e370d12d55d490cda03
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51117618.2060601@cisco.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16383
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2/5/13 10:06 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:
> I don't remember BDP being one of these, though we did have discussion
> that talked about BDP in relation to some of the settings.
> These were more along the lines of max-concurrent-streams,
> max-compressor-state-size, and various other HTTP/2 specific settings
> that the client should know about/respect.

Ok, next question: given that we're mandating a settings frame as part
of connection initialization (at least I think we agreed on that), does
putting this stuff in DNS save anything?

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email