Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Sat, 20 April 2013 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C9121F8FF1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.242
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.242 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.356, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7RwbIYXtbF71 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1791521F8FD6 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UTSjt-0007jh-5A for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:01:41 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:01:41 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UTSjt-0007jh-5A@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1UTSjq-0007iY-J4 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:01:38 +0000
Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1UTSjp-00021r-QE for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:01:38 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id r3K81ErE028867; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:01:14 +0200
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:01:14 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130420080114.GO26517@1wt.eu>
References: <5C8F5647-EC0C-4EE2-81AF-8B1F340E3D24@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5C8F5647-EC0C-4EE2-81AF-8B1F340E3D24@mnot.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.609, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.702, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UTSjp-00021r-QE 5df4dff1f4aec81131b59721671ab676
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: p2: Purely editorial feedback
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20130420080114.GO26517@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17404
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 05:39:50PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Strictly editorial feedback on the current p2:
> * 2 "The target of each HTTP request"   s/each/a/

Isn't it s/each/an/ instead ?

(I'm not a native speaker and that's how I learned it, but I can be corrected).

Willy