Re: Question about resource and representation

"Yi, EungJun" <semtlenori@gmail.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB935129547 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:29:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NnJv0RMZwLsw for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 211C11294FF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cCSIi-0005Z1-9B for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:25:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:25:28 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cCSIi-0005Z1-9B@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <semtlenori@gmail.com>) id 1cCSIX-0005YD-2e for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:25:17 +0000
Received: from mail-yw0-f180.google.com ([209.85.161.180]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <semtlenori@gmail.com>) id 1cCSIQ-0003JK-Cw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:25:11 +0000
Received: by mail-yw0-f180.google.com with SMTP id i145so190525801ywg.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 06:24:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HgVIKEgN/BLprbYqhRpUcUvBdzt2NX13YV7d6akiFdQ=; b=N6oTg+QCN4n4Bokez1tB3RRGz3EbCycdAyyzIDZ/dmtPEtSZ99JKkROXTAVZ064nk3 JZByhhPzAM4ykkSUVOpMZ7RYyaENxzyu1lha12QNTV74yLNTbAKqd2ibHcENZyurExVc stpu9kbQ6HTWsaPWvUmNOi3imAzNZnpR68NnSZxavtnbwC6NUuUiewQbA+3i8yLXg5ox Fd+oyQ4YUc4KI5+329h7lQ7OaadcxjZB20gbRI8lgO7tu5LPZAe4TCpRcLG5QZ5aKpJI 7Jm9vRjo5ejDXX/Cy4++03y79tuAcf91ivo6pPwPOGpAw0XBWjOQR5D/0zF8I4Pwcrqt 8FPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HgVIKEgN/BLprbYqhRpUcUvBdzt2NX13YV7d6akiFdQ=; b=FoHTlQ60ULG0l+VoeJczEr0A6biD8pPqJMleriu2lU0uwyxNeSl59cfqHYtVj0Uiij G7d+vcvqKNJrIo+OcXOqXDF6dIT/Mle0Rcuz/aivIpgBZtlKNJu8ztrOq+V6QtvYzmWk P/CR7rdRRfeo8yQeyheUGJV3fUJscjP4Y8/Q4EcVA9cAPJMN7rMZ1VaclQ1qIuCVcw9G YuqpmiHxn5eN6BaBV53E0+3h+st0+6olNsB+DrKY5cju/SXS5fZp06R6ke16WZaiNuT4 BsRmrzYIVhIWrbgOKlrZ5/KmBCJk+x3F4TaEc2E/Ai7bHVP03ZicSdqGk5P/K/wSFyhs WuJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00e4o2yb+UxD7GtGYpcuwG+iegEJ00UUgcEjWO+tHCnalY27nH/pTp4CCaQQmHpKfRuEw9EfzbDy1uIyw==
X-Received: by 10.157.17.252 with SMTP id y57mr20448020oty.138.1480602283902; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 06:24:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFT+Tg_UcBbHD1yz=26FUa6i6Ja=Z2O5UoJa_id4-MYM-X9iEA@mail.gmail.com> <CALcoZioEH1J67jMGztkujG+9UJSrBJSgqsOtC3K8_4=mpBzM3g@mail.gmail.com> <2AA58F13-74F5-4805-BD55-6EA6774A94C3@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <2AA58F13-74F5-4805-BD55-6EA6774A94C3@mnot.net>
From: "Yi, EungJun" <semtlenori@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:24:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFT+Tg_UpaOFh4WV-0guMfki4dq+-3iZ+dQTT_5Lf9Kw7iFc2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c19204a2f8c450542999505"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.161.180; envelope-from=semtlenori@gmail.com; helo=mail-yw0-f180.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.620, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cCSIQ-0003JK-Cw 67bf2a527e04452c91e9dc4469609d58
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Question about resource and representation
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAFT+Tg_UpaOFh4WV-0guMfki4dq+-3iZ+dQTT_5Lf9Kw7iFc2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33065
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Thanks to Mark Baker and Mark Nottingham. After reading 3.1.4.1
<http://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7231.html#rfc.section.3.1.4.1> Identifying a
Representation <http://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7231.html#identifying.payload>, I
understand why it is unknown.


On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:56 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> See:
>   http://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7231.html#identifying.payload
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 15 Nov. 2016, at 2:35 pm, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Yi, EungJun <semtlenori@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Then what is the resource which the representation enclosed in the POST
> >> request reflects?
> >
> > It is unknown, unless a Content-Location header is present in the
> request.
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>