Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 26 February 2013 00:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE71F21F94D5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:58:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oaAd2heeMKV7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B4D21F94C2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:58:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UA8qa-00082J-6c for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:56:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:56:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UA8qa-00082J-6c@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UA8qR-00081T-J5 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:56:35 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UA8qQ-0006Jb-LO for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:56:35 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.5.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E242322E200; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:56:12 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130222070214.GA14218@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:56:09 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <20D9182A-7D80-41A3-B656-E30485BF5751@mnot.net>
References: <B0FC9D1E-08EF-4275-9851-C8F33F24FF00@mnot.net> <20130222070214.GA14218@1wt.eu>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.350, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UA8qQ-0006Jb-LO 2bd8b7d893618219dc4a62f8985507e2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20D9182A-7D80-41A3-B656-E30485BF5751@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16814
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 22/02/2013, at 6:02 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> I'm still having a problem with the principle behind 2b : when you
> pass through transparent intercepting proxies, by definition you're
> not aware of it. So even if 2a worked for the first connection, it
> does not preclude that 2b will work for the second one. Nor the DNS
> will BTW.

Sorry, I wasn't clear; that would be for cases where you had a high degree of confidence that not only was HTTP/2.0 able to be spoken, but where you have an even higher degree of confidence that HTTP/1.x is NOT; e.g., a separate port (that you might have discovered through DNS, for example).

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/