IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Fri, 26 February 2016 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FDC1ACDCB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:32:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IUS-6eowG3wa for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD98D1ACDD2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aZCnx-0006BN-V5 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:27:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:27:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aZCnx-0006BN-V5@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1aZCnt-0006AQ-4d for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:27:09 +0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de ([217.91.35.233]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1aZCnp-0004dU-2h for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:27:08 +0000
Received: by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix, from userid 117) id C8BBC15A3521; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:26:41 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=greenbytes.de; s=mail; t=1456471601; bh=kpNvgTcSqV8hI/pKcnpgRKF2sCZIBdxuLbyDkKwku5k=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=WAdCqrSwJ9H5MXkPiKM1dR0JdUaqOC86nJmnFbRkFcYC8ttcWwAuNTmVl5u0wpsT7 cAk1eFApteVWAKp1+ojx53KbBkyCBqRQj3+LnV7C9thTmFXLeL0Ot6fVSHJKXTH9jN gAhrBMq+vkkZPtyHFQtbN5Hx6MFwD4HpzkNisgRk=
Received: from [192.168.178.20] (unknown [93.217.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27BF115A3521; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:26:39 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=greenbytes.de; s=mail; t=1456471601; bh=kpNvgTcSqV8hI/pKcnpgRKF2sCZIBdxuLbyDkKwku5k=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=WAdCqrSwJ9H5MXkPiKM1dR0JdUaqOC86nJmnFbRkFcYC8ttcWwAuNTmVl5u0wpsT7 cAk1eFApteVWAKp1+ojx53KbBkyCBqRQj3+LnV7C9thTmFXLeL0Ot6fVSHJKXTH9jN gAhrBMq+vkkZPtyHFQtbN5Hx6MFwD4HpzkNisgRk=
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
References: <20160209074851.32332.24065.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20160209182822.C37A959F@welho-filter2.welho.com> <B7164F24-DDA1-4753-8A8B-04809B1965FF@mnot.net> <CAC4RtVCCExJNE0y8480vC1W56NP4XhzfvLs+ASh1Qy-UcDPBNw@mail.gmail.com> <C2145C5A-0255-43F9-A44A-F6C7974CDD4C@mnot.net> <CABkgnnW3-c1qaC_N2UP5TLnPS0rrOYjOYFb4nhUzfQ_8AFsTJA@mail.gmail.com> <072D900D-422E-4168-8DCF-51A739BC9E5A@mnot.net> <CABkgnnWAbKY8RZ5gvjPan3M_-XpjFSau0yDN97H=CfLb0DNL2g@mail.gmail.com> <2DDC5527-43AC-4BD2-8ED9-F68D747A7E0C@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Message-ID: <56CFFE31.6090503@greenbytes.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:26:41 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2DDC5527-43AC-4BD2-8ED9-F68D747A7E0C@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.91.35.233; envelope-from=julian.reschke@greenbytes.de; helo=mail.greenbytes.de
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.310, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aZCnp-0004dU-2h f48514281f94860cf3d393a9e54f3bbc
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/56CFFE31.6090503@greenbytes.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31103
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-02-26 01:56, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I've taken a stab at this:
>    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/f1024d233157e
>
> Please review.
>
> Cheers,

That says:

>    For the purposes of this document, "reasonable assurances" can be
>    established through use of a TLS-based protocol with the certificate
>    checks defined in [RFC2818].  Other means of establishing them MUST
>    be documented in an RFC that updates this specification.  Clients MAY
>    impose additional criteria for establishing reasonable assurances.

As far as I understand, this is a hook for 
draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-03, which is currently labeled 
"experimental". It is my understanding that experimental RFCs will have 
a hard time "updating" a standards-track RFC, though...

Best regards, Julian

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status