IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)

Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk> Wed, 30 November 2016 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9EC129860 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:12:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9uhuSPEX7RNk for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B21129878 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cC4aT-0007LI-KR for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:06:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:06:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cC4aT-0007LI-KR@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1cC4aI-0007KR-KS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:06:02 +0000
Received: from mail-wj0-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1cC4aC-0004i0-3m for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:05:57 +0000
Received: by mail-wj0-f194.google.com with SMTP id xy5so22138792wjc.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:05:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Fx3aAtwLFbiUyYxAdXOiM6MJ20o3Ub5FbFxzjcY7SjI=; b=YqE8ZKQIvi9PJ+uowYh3TvFLnSDULYPMRHUIkwPkGYy7tNWsMTshoKtXonarejIiFt M5TuHURs0nRXTPxtQzG5u1MWMJvRo6yEGzDKl4rtYYTjI66CUQXRu5xwG3PhnM5Q3bNy pgq/KLEqdsqBaO/4tnxHX1flWIEAEomhDQqKGLW+bF+armWaU8efxHOZWILzSBKRJKaM r6z4sNePmM5f5QfPKJOgLVIzkyJyYdk5oYgdxjBS4eXpCfFDg1/ApKnDfzTiAElU6TbF BGNVkmqATyuwkX6Y2PT72yaGsqOlfwYVc1k40OpUbW7TO2pvkP4Azp/jwHPlX6PEKkSG HAxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Fx3aAtwLFbiUyYxAdXOiM6MJ20o3Ub5FbFxzjcY7SjI=; b=DvXMJJWTEEvTdqRKjHWbQ3F9G23ku/vzVr72B16u+Y3Q5Zy1SjqpZMA8MTLrwNY711 4m4txu+qcvoQwyzg/Qg1L2LuC/J32OJZ3ujelim0GDgaNjqH+ou+9u7TXm0HUeCpJaT3 h26ZrKBHnLqTf43cINAUUQD6sOQyIS6UK07vHofftsXwl8DlnHkt4kmyUPLWMLFOfRZN bEuInit5aOCywJ97HrlregRq/p210p7EAeJHXtHk3/Kk6L6dIoWsAtUP6gB3vr8UCKQO TiP15NmD8bXmCG4aqRGfcy1Olh/Rx77vDqTNctkFXCn4B5NpmJHDYqgu70HzxS3zzKuQ Ig/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03oSETL8GcBF4qEWfOgqdNDajW0iFycFsVqnrmtRSUqGD/GrUjaPQqt1OXiVyEyOQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.248.5 with SMTP id yi5mr28121949wjc.11.1480511128628; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (72.6.208.46.dyn.plus.net. [46.208.6.72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id di9sm72907075wjc.37.2016.11.30.05.05.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:05:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
Message-Id: <24141783-A04A-42AD-9730-EB5C91A36516@lukasa.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ABCCD4FC-97B3-4F59-85E6-CDDFA7732BBC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3257\))
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:05:26 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CANatvzzQZ_isxmd3Ne41QxE2s-sYsrksME+T0RtchM-K1b0DwA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
References: <20161130043354.C786DB81319@rfc-editor.org> <1102C272-E8D6-40D3-9D39-7D4801ABD286@lukasa.co.uk> <CABkgnnXYTi0uv=Dm7zPrA=oPam+Zyka-jujFT2bU8GvqvT5JPg@mail.gmail.com> <03C57CE4-E61A-4BF6-A976-2191EB4B127C@lukasa.co.uk> <CANatvzzQZ_isxmd3Ne41QxE2s-sYsrksME+T0RtchM-K1b0DwA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3257)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.194; envelope-from=cory@lukasa.co.uk; helo=mail-wj0-f194.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.092, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cC4aC-0004i0-3m f7f03af3c198be5554291b072b99823e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/24141783-A04A-42AD-9730-EB5C91A36516@lukasa.co.uk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33043
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 30 Nov 2016, at 13:04, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> My understanding is that you do not need to distinguish between completed, idle and blocked states.
> 
> For a stream under either of the three states, the weight associated to the stream is distributed to the dependents.
> 
> That is what nghttp2 does and H2O does (except for the fact that it does not remember closed streams), and I this behavior is what is suggested by the spec.

My understanding of what Martin is suggesting is that that isn’t true: blocked streams do not distribute their weight to their dependants. However, that’s also what the Python Priority implementation does.

Cory

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email