IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 26 February 2016 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2661B3802 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:05:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tMO7rgojNJ3P for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76AE01B37FD for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aZ5pO-0004D9-LF for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aZ5pO-0004D9-LF@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1aZ5pJ-0003eu-VT for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:10 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1aZ5pE-000708-UR for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:07 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F118C22E1F4; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:59:39 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <56CF7470.8080306@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:59:36 +1100
Cc: HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <495B234C-54F4-463E-B459-319EEB83AAD7@mnot.net>
References: <687A1C0F-067F-4487-A217-7399560FA675@mnot.net> <5E0627D1-45E2-48D5-9A0A-B50B6BA0B644@mnot.net> <56CB4940.8030102@greenbytes.de> <56CEF729.4010800@gmx.de> <A555243D-8A68-487C-B7D0-447AD382835A@mnot.net> <56CF7470.8080306@gmx.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.009, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aZ5pE-000708-UR b550408170760ec58405d3d0e299af50
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/495B234C-54F4-463E-B459-319EEB83AAD7@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31098
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 26 Feb 2016, at 8:38 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> "Endpoints that do not support this frame *will* ignore it (as per thee extensibility rules defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC7540])."

WFM.

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status