Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 02 May 2013 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD8921F8FC6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 08:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GUC-wNAseJIA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 08:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD1821F8FB3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2013 08:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UXvPF-00010j-BE for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 15:26:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 15:26:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UXvPF-00010j-BE@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>) id 1UXvP4-0000zb-K1 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 15:26:38 +0000
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([134.226.56.6]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>) id 1UXvP3-0007DG-QN for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 15:26:38 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F6DBE8E; Thu, 2 May 2013 16:26:16 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u0HhANdBddPu; Thu, 2 May 2013 16:26:16 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:cdfc:bf00:7a90:e70e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:cdfc:bf00:7a90:e70e]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97B90BE88; Thu, 2 May 2013 16:26:16 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <51828599.2050609@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 16:26:17 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Albert Lunde <atlunde@panix.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> <CANmPAYH60+wmeYQAikUd4ps3HdPQSm80TeZbMW37LioBYVj-7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjOPgCse6giEmy3f_MzRTC3K25oAWeAavHnzywc5pL91w@mail.gmail.com> <CANmPAYGr8QDhmLR50UzWYWK_fNYzGbF_P9EN0dOadmL-wQy61g@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjDoRFwPJNWzRqQHdBbV+DjF0mv8OO4RWTBSmh6=Dcnxw@mail.gmail.com> <CANmPAYEirEfpM6kEuxaM3OF7hsjWu8_Lr0aWfQ+btkEGOH3Vsw@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjGaZRVm3NtmT5qO3j7QKNZZiX7zBEV-pDhK0VGGSxuUg@mail.gmail.com> <896F1026-30C6-4397-B265-67285BFA9DDA@gmail.com> <517A5A3D.8030600@cs.tcd.ie> <19554DFB-5B05-495A-B006-EE55A32F3C44@gmail.com> <D6607F77-16B6-4434-82A5-2862615F673C@checkpoint.com> <0A3A9428-0064-4A2D-A726-19257C8BA8B7@gmail.com> <51822D46.6010109@cs.tcd.ie> <A161D29E-31F0-4453-ADAC-F359A4CCA642@gmail.com> <51827C97.2000303@cs.tcd.ie> <A18DFF8B-77A6-480F-BD2F-A7313B80CE58@gmail.com> <51827EF3.1060504@cs.tcd.ie> <5182837D.6040102@panix.com>
In-Reply-To: <5182837D.6040102@panix.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: none client-ip=134.226.56.6; envelope-from=stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; helo=mercury.scss.tcd.ie
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.513, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.473
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UXvP3-0007DG-QN d9f4f91fec1a182d8e8bf15afb0c526d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51828599.2050609@cs.tcd.ie>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17783
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 05/02/2013 04:17 PM, Albert Lunde wrote:
> 
> 
> What one would like is something that restricts what the proxy can do
> and identifies the proxy in a reliable way.

Feel free to propose something. All I've seen in this so far
are proposals to allow proxies to do whatever they want.

That's why I suspect any good solution here is really a
semantic change for HTTP.

S.