#529: Working around concurrency limits

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 02 July 2014 05:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAB21B2876 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OPWmZ6dBTGjC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1675B1B282E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1X2CvG-0006it-4m for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:17:34 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:17:34 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1X2CvG-0006it-4m@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1X2Cv8-0006ha-R9 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:17:26 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1X2Cv8-00046z-14 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:17:26 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.55] (unknown [118.209.193.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 766F622E1F4 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 01:17:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DA218C6A-0B02-4F22-B3A8-CAD46AD0CCEE@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:16:59 +1000
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.060, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1X2Cv8-00046z-14 15215173eef1057482150247f8ade3b0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: #529: Working around concurrency limits
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/DA218C6A-0B02-4F22-B3A8-CAD46AD0CCEE@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/25022
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

<https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/529>

As I just mentioned in the issue, we already limit the requirement to a SHOULD here, allowing proxies to open more connections if they feel it necessary (and indeed, this isn't something we can really test for).

Do we need to do more than that, or can we close the issue?

Regards,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/