Re: Reference set in HPACK

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Wed, 02 July 2014 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D0B1B27BE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFQKNWfNGY05 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9FC1B27B1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1X2FOX-0005Zh-An for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 07:55:57 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 07:55:57 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1X2FOX-0005Zh-An@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1X2FOQ-0005Yy-Jp for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 07:55:50 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.219.54]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1X2FOQ-0006gT-1g for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 07:55:50 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id eb12so11781746oac.41 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FvA4Zm6HY9DTk6bj+OtFH3Me7WIBOGlWRrrNRB7T1mU=; b=LGwhqqwUWi9CzjCXNjsWk+ah6Q88Cmtt4FZF94t9ejHURDo29dhEed/vYkgPMSR6bN nhLir3ncazHlgewQpfngu9FDzceNkMPmJKVxdk7f1eX0XvjpFx7BDIH9kqNiWnYuc9uw BTIxD+ZajD+KoN7z/4Un26OfDpOBlhIsLKU6W4J9Cz41hCnFM6l1hR+dRSN3beAtCtIT cto8H9qLBz40/XmUpYDydNqJgJ1Ta2yCgMHv+nU6+ig36/1lFuuxhby7lhr/jellYb9O xX3AhZV1AF3gTQMOgBGniH9C/B9JT+czK27CnaI88dsxyn23qJyC8be+FA+vthx0O3Pz 85PA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.132.44 with SMTP id or12mr16497666oeb.60.1404287724161; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.108.12 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0356EBBE092D394F9291DA01E8D28EC20118703C3B@sem002pd>
References: <20140702.143041.283993814131065692.kazu@iij.ad.jp> <CAP+FsNexzVzt+YV7oBeMdGrMoajbMVj1Z90XvQfaCuNMDjYdHg@mail.gmail.com> <20140702.145215.1023037072984695261.kazu@iij.ad.jp> <CAP+FsNc+xW1gKma0McrgXtPpwR0BCubHkvHhUbcHHyn1Sd6t0g@mail.gmail.com> <19403.1404282862@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAP+FsNf=RvMaGLr2Dx+VUVwimb6+bxdEgNyV7aL2xPOiFBJcGg@mail.gmail.com> <19819.1404285745@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAP+FsNc9Te7fzTEeKyqWJEAXg6CW9WEGu9qDAQv6c0UP91O+1w@mail.gmail.com> <0356EBBE092D394F9291DA01E8D28EC20118703C3B@sem002pd>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:55:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNe2WzViLtZt4HA7h+TrJV0-4g3EJjmbcMB5ADK4E-LWJA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b4726c8f611c804fd313688"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.54; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f54.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.714, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1X2FOQ-0006gT-1g b5fbc6015b7e7278ffd89cfe0e9ab682
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Reference set in HPACK
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNe2WzViLtZt4HA7h+TrJV0-4g3EJjmbcMB5ADK4E-LWJA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/25080
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:51 AM, <K.Morgan@iaea.org> wrote:

> On Wednesday,02 July 2014 09:43, grmocg@gmail.com wrote:
> > For a client which is creating a new connection, e.g. on a browser
> restart,
> > it may have a great many requests to send. I often have 20 or more tabs
> open,
> > for instance. In cases such as these there are a fair number of requests
> which
> > will look more similar and which should be sent in the first few packets.
> > -=R
>
> It doesn't matter if you have 2 tabs or 50 tabs open.  You can only look
> at the content from 1 tab at a time.
>

Though this is factually incorrect (I have three monitors, and thus often
have three browser instances in full-screen on each), the spirit is that
the number of visible tabs is often much less than that of the number of
tabs total.
Agreed.

The requests still need to be sent, though they should be prioritized
appropriately, and the responses to them from the server sent according to
that priority.
That prioritization is mostly orthogonal, however.
-=R


>
> This email message is intended only for the use of the named recipient.
> Information contained in this email message and its attachments may be
> privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
> communication to others. Also please notify the sender by replying to this
> message and then delete it from your system.
>