Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838)
Etan Kissling <etan.kissling@gmail.com> Mon, 24 October 2016 08:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F551294A7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cEKYe0DwtJVr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C32129641 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1byalV-0003sB-Mv for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:37:53 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1byalV-0003sB-Mv@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1byalQ-0003qu-8J for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:37:48 +0000
Received: from raoul.w3.org ([128.30.52.128]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1byalN-00016c-LJ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:37:47 +0000
Received: from platy.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.7] helo=[192.168.1.37]) by raoul.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1byalM-0003yY-Sr for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:37:45 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3226\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6775C070-8D6E-40AC-8E0C-52D16AC4CA8C"
From: Etan Kissling <etan.kissling@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3a3b3c48-0d71-4c20-6346-5fa9dcb34ff5@greenbytes.de>
Resent-From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:28:08 +0000
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, pmcmanus@mozilla.com, mnot@mnot.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:37:41 +0200
Message-Id: <9E65BB1E-A72A-4F36-92CB-A198D7854CA2@gmail.com>
Resent-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20161022231045.B1778B81CC6@rfc-editor.org> <3a3b3c48-0d71-4c20-6346-5fa9dcb34ff5@greenbytes.de>
X-Name-Md5: efe3dad792d606410c9cc49cedaffc94
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3226)
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.373, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1byalN-00016c-LJ 88f7de198b86a9cba458fc4ab30153d5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/9E65BB1E-A72A-4F36-92CB-A198D7854CA2@gmail.com>
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32669
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thanks for the quick response :-) I'm a bit confused now: Is the form "transfer-parameter = token" allowed as the test suggests, or is it disallowed as the ABNF suggests? Thanks Etan > On 23 Oct 2016, at 10:12, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de <mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>> wrote: > > On 2016-10-23 01:10, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7230, >> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4838 <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4838> >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Etan Kissling <etan.kissling@gmail.com> >> >> Section: 4 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> Parameters are in the form of a name or name=value pair. >> >> transfer-parameter = token BWS "=" BWS ( token / quoted-string ) >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> Parameters are in the form of a name or name=value pair. >> >> transfer-parameter = token >> / token BWS "=" BWS ( token / quoted-string ) >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The form of a name cannot be represented with the original ABNF. >> ... > > > That's true, but that doesn't mean it's an erratum. If's defined this way intentionally, and also hasn't changed compared to RFC 2616. > > Best regards, Julian
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838) Julian Reschke
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838) Julian Reschke
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838) Etan Kissling
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838) Mark Nottingham