Flow control clarification
"Ludin, Stephen" <sludin@akamai.com> Sat, 20 July 2013 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4478911E80D1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O0OixmN2dwdQ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FDC21F9E76 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V0eUw-0004Ue-Pn for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:15:26 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:15:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V0eUw-0004Ue-Pn@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <sludin@akamai.com>) id 1V0eUk-0004TR-8N for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:15:14 +0000
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com ([72.246.2.12]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <sludin@akamai.com>) id 1V0eUj-0005zq-PU for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:15:14 +0000
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id F362DD135D for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:14:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com [172.17.50.21]) by prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01B0D12E8 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:14:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ustx2ex-cashub.dfw01.corp.akamai.com (ustx2ex-cashub7.dfw01.corp.akamai.com [172.27.25.73]) by prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DE0FE06D for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:14:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([169.254.1.88]) by ustx2ex-cashub7.dfw01.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.73]) with mapi; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:14:47 -0500
From: "Ludin, Stephen" <sludin@akamai.com>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:14:46 -0500
Thread-Topic: Flow control clarification
Thread-Index: Ac6FjilWYvoTufqhT8yVfdXxxozBKg==
Message-ID: <CE104626.4728F%sludin@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV1mSg6jgn0BPP-GYyzCZvBTXdq7D3_vonTmP6cMG9VsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: none client-ip=72.246.2.12; envelope-from=sludin@akamai.com; helo=prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.105, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.39
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1V0eUj-0005zq-PU a23ee4a666c902355ae2f8f59ccd2d1f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Flow control clarification
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CE104626.4728F%25sludin@akamai.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18858
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
I want to make certain I am reading this correctly (section 6.9.1): If a receiver has not disabled flow control, it is responsible for sending two WINDOW_UPDATE frames to maintain flow: one for the stream and one for the connection. Correct? Thanks, -stephen
- Default Stream Priority? Kulkarni, Saurabh
- Re: Default Stream Priority? Martin Thomson
- Re: Default Stream Priority? David Morris
- Re: Default Stream Priority? Martin Thomson
- Flow control clarification Ludin, Stephen
- Re: Flow control clarification William Chan (ιζΊζ)
- Re: Flow control clarification Roberto Peon