IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Alt-Svc WGLC

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 15 December 2015 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8AA1ACF1B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:21:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id btP7OUO_p0MA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:21:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B61781ACF1A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:21:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1a8eFE-000739-SD for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 01:17:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 01:17:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1a8eFE-000739-SD@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1a8eF5-00072O-0w for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 01:17:27 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1a8eEz-00016Q-HQ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 01:17:26 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B27C22E271; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:16:55 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <566EA6AF.60100@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:16:52 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AB07B887-8572-4B6D-8604-D40AD25E31A8@mnot.net>
References: <566EA6AF.60100@gmx.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.362, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1a8eEz-00016Q-HQ 53a63221e3a23ca65b4dd03c45819af7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Alt-Svc WGLC
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/AB07B887-8572-4B6D-8604-D40AD25E31A8@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30773
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 14 Dec 2015, at 10:23 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> thanks for the feedback so far.
> 
> With the latest changes for issues <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/125> and <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/126> (see also <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-latest-from-previous.diff.html>), I believe we're almost ready for a new draft and potentially IETF Last Call.

LGTM.

> The remaining open points are:
> 
> 1) In <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015OctDec/0375.html>, Hervé asked for an example of an ALTSVC frame. I note that the HTTP/2 spec doesn't have any examples of frames either, so I'm inclined not to add it.

+0.5.

> 2) In <https://github.com/hruellan/http-extensions/commit/fabd0943cde7e8af07f20b74acc2e48ac16e5f3e>, Hervé proposes a change that IMHO is not editorial as it affects a normative requirement. Feedback appreciated.

I'm OK with this.

> 3) Mike Bishop proposed a change in <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/101> which I was not happy with. Instead, I made the change <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/acc3ae3c4290323069501d55ea8cdb5bacdbc6e8> (which is already in the WGLC draft FWIW). Is anybody not ok with this resolution?

I think it's fine as is.

Just my .02,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status