Re: Draft v1 Update for Resumable Uploads

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 20 June 2022 04:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD32C15D88C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 21:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.759
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.759 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=j2yFIN/N; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=i7VUVzHI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QoknibqYCwFj for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 21:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E76B9C14F72A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 21:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1o39H7-0003mB-MP for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 04:44:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 04:44:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1o39H7-0003mB-MP@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1o39H5-0003ks-P1 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 04:44:31 +0000
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1o39H4-0018Ao-Uj for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 04:44:31 +0000
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5950D3200754; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:44:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:44:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1655700255; x= 1655786655; bh=6UuDn/MwYfmN+UtueVSvNbitSRLwpE3uCIwjLMdEzpQ=; b=j 2yFIN/NppRlf+WprZYOWhqog5AM3QNQ1/UweEkGjw2IssIuZ2Hq/PDPL2vhGR/Ga mF7ILC/ZtAwOq1rnNOBk51EWuozfPtPfp1nwIirQy5aQiojMFrVkCkL/DqP1j1H5 k1ndePrlgJUK2tS5nmXzQlrByaj86h7B40vbtvveaCZrtv79CzZgswYLVLb9de2H ZSS5op4HBTFmgvrNdSeou1ZgWCY38vXqAN72AipxdVIrCpoiMN+ZFuY/cv24c9KC 2k8LaYSsxira6GQxztMXJ5v7xw1gI2Ijf7PSCP/VnRocv/IlU/7JyS4VD0Bb5IUY cNBUt3gbBzktN13wBjTXA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1655700255; x= 1655786655; bh=6UuDn/MwYfmN+UtueVSvNbitSRLwpE3uCIwjLMdEzpQ=; b=i 7VUVzHIpsm5sMtze1UYS1p42txfwAVUYtsoXJKgrgcNC5ztGyWMUGVxtartG/QGN +gmkQj35N/T9Dwm8lNJBfFzMn/pi1lm7Q8wTbSl7r8XD5ZUM6CpflpLxdumhl20D FUy5cqWOdxHCcbZq4udMluWdEbPWeySDHrRZm7EAvLXzW/XFWCs6Fqh9ZY/a6zwW KPlulgZw/DUCdOsXIwYjqwdRqPV4g05TLdoMsk/Xr7DpumbTAVA5tZJGwJvNdpoC Yl9fhSGK6X30O2ON4UIH0oODM0lKIR2Zra6C3A9xKdPb4Tkiqgr9JXibLZR50xyi O7mLqQ76NyuqK85aLol3g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:H_uvYh20Mxdb6SjEP0wwYi6IlD5Odz56UO6CADsV3OlHA4YV8FBFJA> <xme:H_uvYoHah81VbGCLEfCdn3qFDfvBe8TR_3j8tkCCAV1syD3yY--GLHjYILEmuhxqB as750hasUO89-nwVQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:H_uvYh5HdNVE55wv7nIy4t8Br_bH_UY_XsujzQKFCn5JcLlzLTMh4bjgtwS6e6uHyCSEShEqy7iDrAaoHBNr0jyPBvRosW4fI-g7J3h58nAVSX-wCD-dxGl4>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudeftddgkeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghr khcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepledtffekvdfgueegueeuffdtjeetuedvudegteevfedtueduteehfeduveel gfehnecuffhomhgrihhnpehglhhuvghlohhgihgtrdgtohhmpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothes mhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:H_uvYu2n8jIA4iVQZ4rAMlAaV1eCXx_1OZnrqlxsa7XpyPkb_ST3IA> <xmx:H_uvYkEy8ERx_s2ITRoUJ98vtiAcWAnmWIJxwPc8F2bc6sd_pvXX7Q> <xmx:H_uvYv9nPlo9-FwTmcBxA2jOJGSIOlMkeKc_8wakBs1JRQJTlnSvdA> <xmx:H_uvYpTmXHEdIOY2JcrmhXZtQEO-Z3J_W7jI2gx7buRf4YfBBLlUkg>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:44:14 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <Yq/2QBusKXNEEWCL@xps13>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:44:10 +1000
Cc: Guoye Zhang <guoye_zhang@apple.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D07BF099-D66D-4639-85CA-D7A6D6662A60@mnot.net>
References: <BED5A5BC-3F7F-47E2-815E-DC0483328DFD@apple.com> <Yq67WGkb0LtJIAP9@xps13> <D149DCFE-A5C9-418D-80B4-3B5F138AA497@apple.com> <Yq/mYB6FMLWn/7Oj@xps13> <1A0308B7-266A-4E12-BC6C-6D321BAFC3D3@apple.com> <Yq/2QBusKXNEEWCL@xps13>
To: Glenn Strauss <gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=mnot.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=messagingengine.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1o39H4-0018Ao-Uj 7a8b2c23f55b131f9ce17c909e61e99d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Draft v1 Update for Resumable Uploads
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/D07BF099-D66D-4639-85CA-D7A6D6662A60@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40180
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Glenn,

Speaking as WG Chair - 

> On 20 Jun 2022, at 2:23 pm, Glenn Strauss <gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com> wrote:
> 
> Guoye, I respectfully request that you remove yourself from the authors
> drafting this RFC.

Your request isn't appropriate. Their draft is an individual Internet-Draft, and not yet a WG item. Even if it were, authorship reflects the relationship between the person and the document, not people's estimation of who belongs there.

> You continue to struggle with numerous concepts in
> existing standards, including basic HTTP semantics and PATCH media-type,
> and that does not lend itself to productive creation of new RFCs.

This kind of pronouncement isn't helpful to good faith discourse in the group. Please refrain from conveying your opinions about others' competence.

Regards,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/