IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Frame size errors

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Wed, 24 September 2014 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0151A8963 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.065
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.065 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oLI154_LZKu0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 586D71A896F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XWa0q-0001Le-Gp for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:52 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XWa0q-0001Le-Gp@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1XWa0J-0000nr-1C for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:19 +0000
Received: from mail-qg0-f42.google.com ([209.85.192.42]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1XWa0G-0003wL-Pb for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:18 +0000
Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z60so4068157qgd.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YNMJyLBCA5JwiR5xd8RP+64XZPI+eaVOU47WYo41TRc=; b=RtmMNfUsQjQoMPR5WlBYk6yPc4RJGe9Sr8HoRXIldr1Dm2LyN/XRFaKGtMpv4WS+3F t+6saAajXFssRC0MkKMgmAJ6vYfO1WZDi6XWdwiMDdf0wyEwBfD9q5tMuakceUHptfwJ sFTX05dcSuCRoMfuM8dnrp6VR3RWmdiPeisdw/ntr/zUzOWeXyE0uwAZklt/7F+nvUr7 n4Yl10ZdqOfnYm4YeIwYxN6GAALhwwJ7/y1r4Bn5J8A8TkUYGbKES4rOZ1Gh+2TeQ1/p +eHQB4KURjr/+KRXrmRsdDgWbur7dI2wa0XlxHORSn6FngGIfRzOcgxSeRJEl1RFehkQ oU6Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.95.106 with SMTP id h97mr4346873qge.103.1411516791169; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.25.150 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUMkiGfM1shACLBwbnG8J8UAdL_W_ow4T2BMXfMoHXRGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnUMkiGfM1shACLBwbnG8J8UAdL_W_ow4T2BMXfMoHXRGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:59:51 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3c9uKqaMFL5aMo4q3R3LQjPBo8c
Message-ID: <CACweHNBScqFdW904kMnEnX7Unnz0cwF8aYD0QRnzGT+Zqro0xw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c160eeeec7470503c45c08"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.192.42; envelope-from=phluid61@gmail.com; helo=mail-qg0-f42.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.744, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XWa0G-0003wL-Pb dfe95fbf49b08f0d5911366d97c0591b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Frame size errors
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CACweHNBScqFdW904kMnEnX7Unnz0cwF8aYD0QRnzGT+Zqro0xw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27189
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 24 September 2014 02:31, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've prepared a pull request that tightens the restrictions on frame sizes.
>
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/616
>
> Any objections to this change?  It's marked editorial in the tracker,
> but we're at a stage now that I think that substantive changes even as
> minor as this need to be raised here.  I'll hold this for a while and
> pull this in unless I hear screams.
>
>
Just a question on specific word usage: where you have "A ... ​frame of a
length other than ..." I'd have used "... frame with a length ...". It
hints a bit more strongly that the "length" to which we refer is the field
-- which, as was mentioned in a thread a while back, is actually the length
of the payload, not the length of the frame *per se*.

That's just me, though. If you disagree, I'm happy with the change.

(Also I haven't scanned for other usages, to see if that would introduce
inconsistency or an annoyingly large changeset.)



-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status