Re: Status code 451 adoption

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 16 April 2013 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534F721F968A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HnEr4Cf61Bg5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E8121F900F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1US0Zl-0004e0-Ex for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:45:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:45:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1US0Zl-0004e0-Ex@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>) id 1US0Zi-0004Yp-9r for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:45:10 +0000
Received: from mx4.nic.fr ([192.134.4.12]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>) id 1US0Zc-0001Q0-RA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:45:09 +0000
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id C724728062F; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:44:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2303280005; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:44:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2219:8::6:113]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EC74C0082; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:44:07 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:44:07 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130416074407.GA31249@nic.fr>
References: <CAHBU6ityXJne5SbaUXo1hyLrKe43bU3ejVOMN7Tu=tS72h1bAQ@mail.gmail.com> <30003DCB-33F1-4D8B-B141-AB1A175AFC82@mnot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <30003DCB-33F1-4D8B-B141-AB1A175AFC82@mnot.net>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.0
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Received-SPF: none client-ip=192.134.4.12; envelope-from=bortzmeyer@nic.fr; helo=mx4.nic.fr
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.099, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.702
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1US0Zc-0001Q0-RA 723f1f30a91383ca664d5b196faeed6b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Status code 451 adoption
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20130416074407.GA31249@nic.fr>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17249
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:27:10PM +1000,
 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote 
 a message of 15 lines which said:

> The link doesn't seem to work (or, at least, I can't find anything
> about 451 there). Do you have an updated one?

It seems it is
<http://firefox-marketplace-api.readthedocs.org/en/latest/topics/submission.html>

> > http://goo.gl/z3N33

I plan to write a RFC "URL shorteners use on IETF mailing list is bad
for open standards" :-)