Re: Cacheability of 421 (Misdirected Request)
Glen Knowles <gknowles@ieee.org> Thu, 14 April 2016 18:35 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3018D12D663
for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com header.b=otns+PwF;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b=tiESMrDh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id vkL98ej0SQKL
for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A84D12D57D
for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>;
Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>)
id 1aqm2F-0007of-P5
for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:30:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:30:35 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aqm2F-0007of-P5@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39])
by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gknowles92603@gmail.com>)
id 1aqm2C-0007ny-Hm
for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:30:32 +0000
Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175])
by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gknowles92603@gmail.com>)
id 1aqm2A-0002Du-9c
for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:30:32 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id g8so568449igr.0
for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc; bh=UZjuanFxw20RjIva9FW5DNxR7P1/B0gNQQvA+RkpKEY=;
b=otns+PwFCms67BEzEGYL0w54dnsjj6eHTjuvk0rhaSbVwdHMddAXOBM1luVsXn5cfF
Uh+acusbgX1G9wOhbW8gtXH3BEXNpMy4IwBCYalpTcSfH2WvDtf8NqczufHblfJJiF1p
J91Z8anW0Tnuj8eI599abtQcDPClWkjCp7Sghle7rYzP9sBG0JMgtmL4wkdu0UGc1AMA
MHrbIE4UABHOkcs67e+7MnMMqmo5vEihEAMK+K4IhKJjQL88rZiuNTccAjblZD4hfKF5
9+cO+WF1A/az9LzwNMo9TuL0v9N22JlwjMSgFAvL2nplsrbUpJs/E4wc35NWWeIRpRTI
Lnmw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc; bh=UZjuanFxw20RjIva9FW5DNxR7P1/B0gNQQvA+RkpKEY=;
b=tiESMrDhHGATOvenKeXZdj8UVAzqTD2crwdZvDhK+vyHmELvDv47u4ME1XnIp78Kc5
MfVyAY+qwI91k9n5qZ8+nkYDNKraOWtFcpt6NhmLMIibAVwwmQjDWZPoA9uBnkbux0Si
BrfWuqObIOMqZbsCiAg51InGppPp59BPVbyrOeDdcty8HZpv85yDgrJsj9MaArHqc5Fe
1N1hbYun25Q+4PhUtJHx/OYIcMBPNBAmevE1vWlBZgtt2L3iwAYlPv0iFqq7+ZRtNBZY
Cw2mhndYfVp7wb8xpvgph33OqoBzFj08dttMqPHXq/FH7McMmIdNBtTK0EXe8m916akl
yrmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
bh=UZjuanFxw20RjIva9FW5DNxR7P1/B0gNQQvA+RkpKEY=;
b=lZGKpf67wKQq6Ybyp6nEGbp7HV+xvm89dvsh64W0vWC4MjjMJuLrSgf86SNTuZVNaj
ryWU8JfgB87uuwZNKVAU4CSr6vh9hR4YxZDAk3wCEu/vmtLvDJlKguhmB3QwvnNi1ioc
9sVjBcqIi52puMyLr6TB5aaWxYYhb1oonLSvwmvuGd67K++r7awNSPgDM+YRYa8KYH3T
bzXR5QI9SqsKpOeo4XWdYH0D+kGePSluX3YqE8JFbLew3BsjlhS3qBMix8mZRDhAma8i
XG4Oghh5+y5lxfLnTpdBPJ1891cr2hQCv3ikrSBmUFyWOMvQA7vSXvYb2hhVKq8hPfgy
9r/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWROtfiCQVAvP5pOhKOVcO9oS9essf6GtpS28W6vjq6ASlKvRJQmKNeF4IhWlLf4ajtQmp8xGYR6Xm/yQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.186.136 with SMTP id fk8mr75457igc.11.1460658603675; Thu,
14 Apr 2016 11:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: gknowles92603@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.149.70 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E2C4E7E-5719-41F5-B50C-8EAFFE87D6BF@mnot.net>
References: <CALHHdhwPrpFRApRHAHufYBphBVX9NCc8HfxLEpnw6CGM+YBqOQ@mail.gmail.com>
<4E2C4E7E-5719-41F5-B50C-8EAFFE87D6BF@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:30:03 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: T-Sy0nZlgQtIYhnG9ss1t5gx4lM
Message-ID: <CAJCH0yCdSU3N5kCi7h2aSOyG=S_g_f0YO2B5nas9dxKCvSqgmA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Glen Knowles <gknowles@ieee.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Vasiliy Faronov <vfaronov@gmail.com>,
HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93410c135d97505307615f2
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.213.175;
envelope-from=gknowles92603@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f175.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.833, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1,
W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aqm2A-0002Du-9c 40bd4c831e7c92713321451cb13c5adb
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Cacheability of 421 (Misdirected Request)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJCH0yCdSU3N5kCi7h2aSOyG=S_g_f0YO2B5nas9dxKCvSqgmA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31459
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > I agree that with many use cases, having 421 be cacheable by default isn't > very helpful, although it's easy enough to assure that it isn't cached > (e.g., with Cache-Control: no-store). > > Does anyone else remember some more context around this? > > If no where else, it was discussed briefly as part of this thread: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015AprJun/0480.html
- Cacheability of 421 (Misdirected Request) Vasiliy Faronov
- Re: Cacheability of 421 (Misdirected Request) Mark Nottingham
- Re: Cacheability of 421 (Misdirected Request) Glen Knowles